Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37615763›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

US of thyroid nodules: can AI-assisted diagnostic system compete with fine needle aspiration?

Tianhan Zhou, Lei Xu, Jingjing Shi, Yu Zhang, Xiangfeng Lin, Yuanyuan Wang, Tao Hu, Rujun Xu, Lesi Xie, Lijuan Sun and 18 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Tianhan Zhou *Department of Surgical Oncology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Lei Xu *Zhejiang Qiushi Institute for Mathematical Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jingjing Shi *Department of Surgical Oncology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yu Zhang *Department of Surgical Oncology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xiangfeng LinDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Yuanyuan WangDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University, Zhengzhou, China.
Tao HuThe Fourth Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Rujun XuDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Lesi XieDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Lijuan SunDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Dandan LiDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Wenhua ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Chuanghua ChenDepartment of Ultrasonography, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Ultrasonography, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Chenke XuDepartment of Ultrasonography, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Fanlei KongDepartment of Ultrasonography, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yanping XunDepartment of Translational Medicine Research Center, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Lingying YuDepartment of Endocrinology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Shirong ZhangDepartment of Translational Medicine Research Center, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jinwang DingDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Cancer hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Fan WuDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Tian TangThe Fourth Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Siqi ZhanThe Fourth Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Jiaoping ZhangDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Guoyang WuDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China. wuguoyangmail@aliyun.com.
Haitao ZhengDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai, China. zhenghaitao1972@126.com.
Dexing KongCollege of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China. dkong@zju.edu.cn.
Dingcun LuoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. ldc65@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7320-4202
Hangzhou First People's Hospital · CNZhejiang Chinese Medical University · CNQingdao University · CNCancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Henan University · CNZhejiang Normal University · CNZhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University · CN

Funding

Zhejiang Basic Public Welfare Research Project LGF22H160082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesArtificial intelligence (AI) systems can diagnose thyroid nodules with similar or better performance than radiologists. Little is known about how this performance compares with that achieved through fine needle aspiration (FNA). This study aims to compare the diagnostic yields of FNA cytopathology alone and combined with BRAFV600E mutation analysis and an AI diagnostic system.

methodsThe ultrasound images of 637 thyroid nodules were collected in three hospitals. The diagnostic efficacies of an AI diagnostic system, FNA-based cytopathology, and BRAFV600E mutation analysis were evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the κ coefficient with respect to the gold standard, defined by postsurgical pathology and consistent benign outcomes from two combined FNA and mutation analysis examinations performed with a half-year interval.

resultsThe malignancy threshold for the AI system was selected according to the Youden index from a retrospective cohort of 346 nodules and then applied to a prospective cohort of 291 nodules. The combination of FNA cytopathology according to the Bethesda criteria and BRAFV600E mutation analysis showed no significant difference from the AI system in terms of accuracy for either cohort in our multicenter study. In addition, for 45 included indeterminate Bethesda category III and IV nodules, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the AI system were 84.44%, 95.45%, and 73.91%, respectively.

conclusionsThe AI diagnostic system showed similar diagnostic performance to FNA cytopathology combined with BRAFV600E mutation analysis. Given its advantages in terms of operability, time efficiency, non-invasiveness, and the wide availability of ultrasonography, it provides a new alternative for thyroid nodule diagnosis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Thyroid ultrasonic artificial intelligence shows statistically equivalent performance for thyroid nodule diagnosis to FNA cytopathology combined with BRAFV600E mutation analysis. It can be widely applied in hospitals and clinics to assist radiologists in thyroid nodule screening and is expected to reduce the need for relatively invasive FNA biopsies. KEY POINTS: • In a retrospective cohort of 346 nodules, the evaluated artificial intelligence (AI) system did not significantly differ from fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytopathology alone and combined with gene mutation analysis in accuracy. • In a prospective multicenter cohort of 291 nodules, the accuracy of the AI diagnostic system was not significantly different from that of FNA cytopathology either alone or combined with gene mutation analysis. • For 45 indeterminate Bethesda category III and IV nodules, the AI system did not perform significantly differently from BRAFV600E mutation analysis.

Indexed as

Thyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleArtificial IntelligenceBiopsy, Fine-NeedleHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceBiopsyCytologyThyroid nodule

Identifiers

PMID37615763
OpenAlexW4386116994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.