Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37615755›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2024

Memory for abstract control states does not decay with increasing retrieval delays.

Moritz Schiltenwolf, Andrea Kiesel, Christian Frings, David Dignath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Transfer of cognitive control adjustments within and between speakers.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026
    Article
  3. Changes in aperiodic (1/bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Moritz SchiltenwolfDepartment of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Schleichstrasse 4, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. moritz.schiltenwolf@uni-tuebingen.de.
Andrea KieselUniversity of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Christian FringsUniversity of Trier, Trier, Germany.
David DignathDepartment of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Schleichstrasse 4, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. david.dignath@uni-tuebingen.de.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DI2126/3-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that abstract control states (i.e., internal attentional states independent from concrete stimuli and responses) can be stored in episodic memory and retrieved subsequently. However, the duration of such a control state memory remains unclear. Previous research has found a quick and complete decay for stimulus-response bindings after 2000-5000 ms. Here, we tested a possible decay of control state bindings with retrieval delays of 2000, 3000, or 5000 ms. Five preregistered experiments used a confound-minimized prime-target task to measure the congruency sequence effect (CSE) separately for trials in which a nominally irrelevant context feature changed or repeated across trials. Analyses of the individual experiments did not result in conclusive evidence. A mega-analysis integrating the data of all experiments (N

Indexed as

AttentionMemory, EpisodicBayes TheoremHumansPhotic StimulationReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID37615755
PMCPMC10858070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.