Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37615692›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[Large language models such as ChatGPT and GPT-4 for patient-centered care in radiology].

Matthias A Fink

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Matthias A FinkKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. matthias.fink@uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the introduction of ChatGPT in late November 2022, large language models based on artificial intelligence have gained worldwide recognition. These language models are trained on vast amounts of data, enabling them to process complex tasks in seconds and provide detailed, high-level text-based responses.

objectiveTo provide an overview of the most widely discussed large language models, ChatGPT and GPT‑4, with a focus on potential applications for patient-centered radiology. MATERIALS AND

methodsA PubMed search of both large language models was performed using the terms "ChatGPT" and "GPT-4", with subjective selection and completion in the form of a narrative review.

resultsThe generic nature of language models holds great promise for radiology, enabling both patients and referrers to facilitate understanding of radiological findings, overcome language barriers, and improve the quality of informed consent discussions. This could represent a significant step towards patient-centered or person-centered radiology.

conclusionLarge language models represent a promising tool for improving the communication of findings, interdisciplinary collaboration, and workflow in radiology. However, important privacy issues and the reliable applicability of these models in medicine remain to be addressed.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadiologyHumansLanguagePatient-Centered CareRadiographyArtificial IntelligenceDeep LearningMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingPatient-centred approach

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.