Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37615678›Full record

ReviewArchives of toxicology2023

A database of human predictive patch test data for skin sensitization.

Judy Strickland, Jaleh Abedini, David G Allen, John Gordon, Victoria Hull, Nicole C Kleinstreuer, Hon-Sum Ko, Joanna Matheson, Hermann-Josef Thierse, James Truax and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Judy StricklandInotiv, Inc, Morrisville, NC, USA. judy.strickland@inotivco.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4112-7484
Jaleh AbediniInotiv, Inc, Morrisville, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8021-0977
David G AllenInotiv, Inc, Morrisville, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8575-9547
John GordonUnited States Consumer Product Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9781-9842
Victoria HullInotiv, Inc, Morrisville, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2650-4392
Nicole C KleinstreuerNational Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Division of Translational Toxicology, National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7914-3682
Hon-Sum KoUnited States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9915-7275
Joanna MathesonUnited States Consumer Product Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9912-0322
Hermann-Josef ThierseGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9655-681X
James TruaxInotiv, Inc, Morrisville, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3550-5602
Jens T VanselowGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8900-8209
Matthias HerzlerGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5636-8152

Funding

NIEHS NIH HHS HHSN273201500010C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical to the evaluation of non-animal tests are reference data with which to assess their relevance. Animal data are typically used because they are generally standardized and available. However, when regulatory agencies aim to protect human health, human reference data provide the benefit of not having to account for possible interspecies variability. To support the evaluation of non-animal approaches for skin sensitization assessment, we collected data from 2277 human predictive patch tests (HPPTs), i.e., human repeat insult patch tests and human maximization tests, for skin sensitization from 1555 publications. We recorded protocol elements and positive or negative outcomes, developed a scoring system to evaluate each test for reliability, and calculated traditional and non-traditional dose metrics. We also traced each test result back to its original report to remove duplicates. The resulting database, which contains information for 1366 unique substances, was characterized for physicochemical properties, chemical structure categories, and protein binding mechanisms. This database is publicly available on the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods website and in the Integrated Chemical Environment to serve as a resource for additional evaluation of alternative methods and development of new approach methodologies for skin sensitization assessments.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingSkinDatabases, FactualHumansPatch TestsReproducibility of ResultsAllergic contact dermatitis; human predictive patch test dataReference dataSkin sensitization

Identifiers

PMID37615678
PMCPMC10504114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.