ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2023
Inexpensive DIY Bioprinting in a Secondary School Setting.
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extrusion bioprinting: meeting the promise of human tissue biofabrication?Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2025Review
- The Enderstruder: An accessible open-source syringe extruder compatible with Ender series 3D printers.HardwareX · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioprinting is a technique that allows custom printing of cell-laden tissue using the principle of three-dimensional (3D) printing. The technique has various applications, ranging from tissue engineering to materials science. Bioprinting is an attractive topic for science, technology, engineering, and math education due to its novelty and interdisciplinary nature. Nonetheless, a basic commercial bioprinter could cost several thousand U.S. dollars. There have been attempts to construct low-cost do-it-yourself bioprinters for research purpose. However, those methods required expertise, uncommon reagents, and professional equipment, making it difficult for teachers and students in secondary schools to replicate. Here, we demonstrate how teachers and students in a secondary school can convert a 3D printer into a bioprinter for conducting a hands-on bioprinting activity using secondary school-available resources. Briefly, an open-source Creality Ender 3 V2 3D printer in a school was converted into a bioprinter using 3D-printed parts and other readily available materials. Cell-laden bioink and support medium were made using school-available reagents. The bioprinter can be easily constructed and operated by teachers and students who do not have prior knowledge in coding and engineering. We used the bioprinter to print a coronary artery model and an algae-laden artificial leaf. The photosynthetic activity of the artificial leaf could be observed and investigated using a hydrogen carbonate indicator. The work described in this paper could make bioprinting available, comprehensible, and enjoyable to secondary school students, opening a door for inexpensive innovative teaching and learning activities using bioprinting in secondary schools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.