Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37614700›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2023

Male partners' support and influence on pregnant women's oral PrEP use and adherence in Malawi.

Alinda M Young, Friday Saidi, Twambilile Phanga, Jennifer Tseka, Agatha Bula, Pearson Mmodzi, Lisa D Pearce, Suzanne Maman, Carol E Golin, Wilbroad Mutale and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alinda M YoungDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Friday SaidiUNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Twambilile PhangaUNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Jennifer TsekaUNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Agatha BulaUNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Pearson MmodziUNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Lisa D PearceDepartment of Sociology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Suzanne MamanDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Carol E GolinDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Wilbroad MutaleDepartment of Health Policy, University of Zambia School of Public Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Benjamin H ChiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Lauren M HillDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USRTI International · USUniversity of Zambia · ZM

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Promoting PrEP shared decision-making and adherence among pregnant and breastfeeding women in ZambiaK01MH121186 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HILL, LAUREN · 2020 to 2024
$906k
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH121186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a safe and effective HIV prevention method for pregnant and postpartum women, but adherence barriers exist. Understanding the role of male partners in supporting PrEP use may inform strategies to support PrEP adherence among pregnant and breastfeeding women. Methods: To understand male partners' involvement in women's use of PrEP, we conducted in-depth interviews with pregnant women in Lilongwe, Malawi who had recently decided to use PrEP ( Results: Most male partners were receptive to women using PrEP during pregnancy because it eased their fears of the woman and baby acquiring HIV. Men often played a key role in women's PrEP adherence by providing daily reminders and encouragement to adhere to their medication. The majority of women appreciated this support from the men as it lessened the burden of remembering to take their medications daily on their own and aided their adherence. However, several women who lacked male partner support spoke of wanting their partners to be more involved. Many men living with HIV found the mutual support beneficial for their antiretroviral therapy adherence, while men without HIV or with status unknown appreciated knowing that the family was protected. While most men were open to women continuing PrEP beyond the current study, some would only support it if women were still at risk for acquiring HIV. Conclusion: In this study, male partners were strongly motivated to support the PrEP adherence of their female partners as a way of ensuring that the pregnant women and unborn babies were protected against HIV. Promoting disclosure and tangible support that arises organically among men may be helpful, but programs to enhance this support and identify ways to support women who do not receive support from their partners or do not wish to disclose their PrEP use to partners may be needed.

Indexed as

HIVMalawimale partnerspregnant and breastfeeding womenPrEPsocial support

Identifiers

PMID37614700
PMCPMC10442580
OpenAlexW4385663552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.