ArticleEndoscopy international open2023
Prospective assessment of the accuracy of ASGE and ESGE guidelines for choledocholithiasis.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of Diagnostic Guidelines in the Evaluation of Choledocholithiasis in Patients With Acute Biliary Presentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.World journal of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Upfront laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus preoperative MRCP or ERCP in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Unnecessary ERCPs: Is Spontaneous Stone Passage the Sole Determinant?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Endoscopic Ultrasound and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Bile Duct Stones-Avoiding the Avoidable.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Approach to biliary tree clearance in pediatric patients undergoing cholecystectomy: insights from a tertiary hospital.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.