Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37614509›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Prediction of extracapsular extension in prostate cancer using the Likert scale combined with clinical and pathological parameters.

Jun-Guang Wang, Bin-Tian Huang, Li Huang, Xia Zhang, Pei-Pei He, Jun-Bo Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jun-Guang WangDepartment of Radiology, Ningbo Yinzhou No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Bin-Tian HuangDepartment of Radiology, Ningbo Yinzhou No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Li HuangDepartment of Radiology, Ningbo Yinzhou No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Xia ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Ningbo Yinzhou No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Pei-Pei HeDepartment of Radiology, Ningbo Yinzhou No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Jun-Bo ChenDepartment of Radiology, Ningbo Yinzhou No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Ningbo No. 2 Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed to investigate the independent clinical, pathological, and radiological factors associated with extracapsular extension in radical prostatectomy specimens and to improve the accuracy of predicting extracapsular extension of prostate cancer before surgery. Methods: From August 2018 to June 2023, the clinical and pathological data of 229 patients with confirmed prostate cancer underwent radical prostatectomy from The Second Hospital of Yinzhou. The patients' multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging data were graded using the Likert scale. The chi-square or independent-sample T-test was used to analyze the related factors for an extracapsular extension. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with extracapsular extension in prostate cancer. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to calculate the area under the curve and assess the diagnostic performance of our model. The clinical decision curve was used to analyze the clinical net income of Likert scale, biopsy positive rate, biopsy GG, and combined mode. Results: Of the 229 patients, 52 had an extracapsular extension, and 177 did not. Multivariate analysis showed that the Likert scale score, biopsy grade group and biopsy positive rate were independent risk factors for extracapsular extension in prostate cancer. The area under the curves for the Likert scale score, biopsy grade group, and biopsy positive rate were 0.802, 0.762, and 0.796, respectively. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the diagnostic efficiency for extracapsular extension (P>0.05). However, when these three factors were combined, the diagnostic efficiency was significantly improved, and the area under the curve increased to 0.905 (P<0.05). In the analysis of the decision curve, The clinical net income of the combined model is obviously higher than that of Likert scale, biopsy positive rate, and biopsy GG. Conclusion: The Likert scale, biopsy grade group and biopsy positive rate are independent risk factors for extracapsular extension in prostate cancer, and their combination can significantly improve the diagnostic efficiency for an extracapsular extension.

Indexed as

biopsy grade groupextracapsular extensionmagnetic resonance imagingprostate cancerprostate-specific antigen

Identifiers

PMID37614509
PMCPMC10442837
OpenAlexW4385898939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.