Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37614505›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Machine learning decision tree models for multiclass classification of common malignant brain tumors using perfusion and spectroscopy MRI data.

Rodolphe Vallée, Jean-Noël Vallée, Carole Guillevin, Athéna Lallouette, Clément Thomas, Guillaume Rittano, Michel Wager, Rémy Guillevin, Alexandre Vallée

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rodolphe ValléeInterdisciplinary Laboratory in Neurosciences, Physiology and Psychology (LINP2), Université Paris Lumière (UPL), Paris Nanterre University, Nanterre, France.
Jean-Noël ValléeLaboratory of Mathematics and Applications (LMA) Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Unité Mixte de Recherche (CNRS UMR)7348, i3M-DACTIM-MIH (Data Analysis and Computations Through Imaging Modeling - Mathematics, Image, Health), Poitiers University, Poitiers, France.
Carole GuillevinLaboratory of Mathematics and Applications (LMA) Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Unité Mixte de Recherche (CNRS UMR)7348, i3M-DACTIM-MIH (Data Analysis and Computations Through Imaging Modeling - Mathematics, Image, Health), Poitiers University, Poitiers, France.
Athéna LallouetteCenter of Genève Ophtalmologie, Geneve, Switzerland.
Clément ThomasLaboratory of Mathematics and Applications (LMA) Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Unité Mixte de Recherche (CNRS UMR)7348, i3M-DACTIM-MIH (Data Analysis and Computations Through Imaging Modeling - Mathematics, Image, Health), Poitiers University, Poitiers, France.
Guillaume RittanoRadiology Department, Hopital Riveira Chablais, Rennaz, Switzerland.
Michel WagerNeurosurgery Department, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers University, Poitiers, France.
Rémy GuillevinLaboratory of Mathematics and Applications (LMA) Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Unité Mixte de Recherche (CNRS UMR)7348, i3M-DACTIM-MIH (Data Analysis and Computations Through Imaging Modeling - Mathematics, Image, Health), Poitiers University, Poitiers, France.
Alexandre ValléeDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To investigate the contribution of machine learning decision tree models applied to perfusion and spectroscopy MRI for multiclass classification of lymphomas, glioblastomas, and metastases, and then to bring out the underlying key pathophysiological processes involved in the hierarchization of the decision-making algorithms of the models. Methods: From 2013 to 2020, 180 consecutive patients with histopathologically proved lymphomas (n = 77), glioblastomas (n = 45), and metastases (n = 58) were included in machine learning analysis after undergoing MRI. The perfusion parameters (rCBV Results: The decision tree model thus constructed successfully classified all 3 tumor types with a performance (AUC) of 0.98 for PCNSLs, 0.98 for GBM and 1.00 for METs. The model accuracy was 0.96 with a RSquare of 0.887. Five rules of classifier combinations were extracted with a predicted probability from 0.907 to 0.989 for that end nodes of the decision tree for tumor multiclass classification. In hierarchical order of importance, the root node (Cho/NAA) in the decision tree algorithm was primarily based on the proliferative, infiltrative, and neuronal destructive characteristics of the tumor, the internal node (PSRmax), on tumor tissue capillary permeability characteristics, and the end node (Lac/Cr or Cho/Cr), on tumor energy glycolytic (Warburg effect), or on membrane lipid tumor metabolism. Conclusion: Our study shows potential implementation of machine learning decision tree model algorithms based on a hierarchical, convenient, and personalized use of perfusion and spectroscopy MRI data for multiclass classification of these brain tumors.

Indexed as

classification and regression tree (CART)glioblastomalymphomametastasismulticlass classification

Identifiers

PMID37614505
PMCPMC10442801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.