The Effectiveness of Online Learning in Improving the Electrocardiogram Interpretation Skills of Junior Medical Trainees: A Mixed Methods Observational Study.

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic hindered medical education and limited access to clinical skills training for trainee medical doctors, including electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation. These restrictions prompted a shift towards virtual training environments and online learning. In this study, we assessed the impact of the pandemic on trainees' confidence and their perceived difficulty in independently interpreting ECGs. Additionally, we examined the effectiveness of two online learning approaches, namely lectures and case-solving webinars, in improving their skills. Methods The study was a mixed methods observational study conducted in three phases. In the first phase, a cross-sectional study was conducted to subjectively assess the trainees' confidence levels and the perceived difficulty independently reading ECGs. The second phase involved a cohort study where an online learning module consisting of eight lecture-based sessions was implemented. This module covered all the topics recommended in the foundation doctor training curriculum. The third phase also involved a cohort study where an online case-based discussion learning module with two problem-solving webinars was introduced. We assessed the outcomes on a 1 to 10 Likert scale for confidence and perceived difficulty in independently reading ECGs. Results Sixty-five trainees participated in the initial cross-sectional study. Among them, 100% of the participants reported substantial difficulty in interpreting ECGs (scoring 6 or more on the Likert scale), and 76.5% of the participants did not feel enough confidence to read ECGs independently (scoring 6 or less). Ten trainees attended the second phase. Online lectures significantly increased the mean confidence score by 1.9 points (t(9) = 2.82, p = 0.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.38-3.42]) and significantly reduced the mean of the perceived difficulty score by 2.7 points (t(9) = 5.71, p < 0.001, 95% CI [1.63-3.77]). Compared to the online lectures, the online problem-solving sessions significantly increased the mean of the composite score of confidence and perceived difficulty in reading ECGs (-0.8 vs. 4 points, 95% CI [1.49, 8.26], p = 0.011). Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected the ECG reading skills of junior medical trainees. However, the online teaching approach effectively improved their confidence and the level of difficulty they experienced in ECG interpretation. Applying online case problem-solving was found to be superior to the lecture-based approach in enhancing these parameters.