SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2023
The benefit and risk of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prognosis of radical prostatectomy combined with pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2026Pooled it
- The safety and efficacy of binimetinib for lung cancer: a systematic review.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of combining PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with anti-angiogenic agents in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Treatment-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of the efficacy of programmed cell death 1/its ligand inhibitors plus cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Mapping the research trends and hotspots on solid pulmonary nodules from 2000-2024: insights from bibliometric analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Advances in molecular pathology and therapy of non-small cell lung cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors for second- or later-line therapy of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- The Predictive Significance of Various Prognostic Scoring Systems on the Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapy Combined with Anlotinib as First-Line Treatment in Older NSCLC Patients with PD-L1 Expression<50.Current cancer drug targets · 2025Observational
- Strengthening Effect of Thalidomide Combined with an Anti-PD1 Antibody on Enhancing Immunity for Lung Cancer Therapy.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025Article
- Unraveling NEAT1's complex role in lung cancer biology: a comprehensive review.EXCLI journal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies revealed that Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/Programmed cell death-Ligand protein 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents had extensive anti-tumor activities. However, almost all studies on the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer are non-randomized controlled trials with small sample sizes, which might lead to a lack of effective metrics to assess the effectiveness and safety of the therapeutic regimen. Here, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: A single-arm meta-analysis was performed, and published literature from PubMed, Web of Science and Embase databases as of January 13, 2023, was systematically retrieved. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool and methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) Methodological items to evaluate the quality of eligible clinical trials. Outcomes including overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were extracted for further analysis. The random effect model is used to calculate the pooled parameters. Results: 19 studies (16 were non-comparative single-arm clinical trials and 3 were randomized controlled trials) were enrolled in this meta-analysis. In terms of tumor response, the pooled ORR and DCR were 22.4% (95% CI, 16.6-28.1%) and 76.8% (95% CI, 72.6-81.1%), respectively. With regard to survival analysis, the pooled PFS and OS were 5.20 (95% CI, 4.46-5.93) months and 14.09 (95% CI, 13.20-14.97) months, respectively. The pooled grade ≥3 adverse effect (AE) rate was 47.6% (95% CI, 33.1-62.0%). Conclusion: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents has promising efficacy and safety as second or later-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023407559.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.