ReviewAnimal models and experimental medicine2023
Animal models for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: Are current models good enough?
Review in Animal models and experimental medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishment of a mouse model of TMAO-induced cardiac injury and application of MICT intervention.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Animal models for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: Are current models good enough?Animal models and experimental medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a rare and severe systemic autoimmune disease characterized by pauci-immune necrotizing inflammation of small blood vessels. AAV involves multiple organ systems throughout the body. Our knowledge of the pathogenesis of AAV has increased considerably in recent years, involving cellular, molecular and genetic factors. Because of the controlled environment with no other confounding factors, animal models are beneficial for studying the mechanistic details of disease development and for providing novel therapeutic targets with fewer toxic side effects. However, the complexity and heterogeneity of AAV make it very difficult to establish a single animal model that can fully represent the entire clinical spectrum found in patients. The aim of this review is to overview the current status of animal models for AAV, outline the pros and cons of methods, and propose potential directions for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.