Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37614066›Full record

Trial reportActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2023

One-year follow up of contraceptive use and pregnancy rates after early medical abortion: Secondary outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of immediate post-abortion placement of intrauterine devices.

Sara Hogmark, Niklas Envall, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, Helena Kopp Kallner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03603145 (Immediate Versus Delayed Insertion of Intrauterine Contraception at the Time of Medical Abortion- An Open-label, Randomized, Multicenter Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03603145 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Immediate Versus Delayed Insertion of Intrauterine Contraception at the Time of Medical Abortion- An Open-label, Randomized, Multicenter Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2019 to 2024Enrolled720ConditionsContraceptive UsageArmsImmediate insertion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sara HogmarkDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6061-3982
Niklas EnvallDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2813-7642
Kristina Gemzell-DanielssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6516-1444
Helena Kopp KallnerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7184-9165
Dalarna University · SEDanderyds sjukhus · SEUppsala University · SEWorld Health Organization - Pakistan · PK

Funding

Centrum fÖr Klinisk Forskning Dalarna CKFUU-789891Centrum fÖr Klinisk Forskning Dalarna CKFUU-895571Centrum fÖr Klinisk Forskning Dalarna CKFUU-93Centrum fÖr Klinisk Forskning Dalarna CKFUU-934198Karolinska Institutet K 0138-2015Karolinska Institutet LS-2016-1376Karolinska Institutet LS 2018-1257Karolinska Institutet RS 2019-1054Svenska Läkaresällskapet SLS-692651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntrauterine devices (IUDs) effectively prevent unwanted pregnancies. Little is known about long-term outcomes of women choosing an IUD after early medical abortion. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe present secondary outcome data of continuation rates, factors associated with continuation and discontinuation, choice of IUD type, women's satisfaction with IUD, and IUD expulsions, subsequent pregnancies, and abortions within 1 year post-abortion in a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial on IUD placement within 48 hours compared with placement 2-4 weeks after medical abortion up to 63 days' gestation (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03603145).

resultsOf the 240 women studied, 112/120 (93.3%) in the intervention group vs 113/120 (94.2%) in the control group completed the 12-month follow-up. The rate of IUD use at 12 months was 84/112 (75%) in the intervention group vs 75/113 (66.4%) in the control group (P = 0.19). Attendance at the IUD placement visit was the only predictor of long-term IUD use (relative risk [RR] = 5.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-16.0; P = 0.001). The main reason for choosing an IUD was high contraceptive effectiveness. The most common reasons for IUD discontinuation were bleeding problems and abdominal pain. IUD expulsion was rare and did not differ between groups. Satisfaction among IUD users at 1 year was high (>94%) and the majority of all participants would recommend IUD to a friend (65.8%). Use of no contraception and experience of unprotected intercourse were less common in the intervention group (11/112 [9.8%] vs 25/113 [22.1%], P = 0.02 and 17/112 [15.2%] vs 32/113 [28.3%], P = 0.02, respectively). There was no difference in the rate of subsequent pregnancies and abortions (pregnancies 14/112, 12.5% in the intervention group vs 8/113, 7.1% in the control group, P = 0.19; abortions 5/112, 4.5% vs 3/113, 2.7%, P = 0.5).

conclusionsIUD placement after medical abortion led to high continuation and satisfaction rates with no difference between groups. We found no difference in IUD expulsions after immediate compared with later placement. Unprotected intercourse was significantly less common in the immediate group. In clinical practice, immediate placement of IUDs available free of charge at the abortion clinic is likely to increase attendance to the placement visit and continued use of IUDs after abortion.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAbortion, SpontaneousIntrauterine DevicesIntrauterine Devices, CopperContraceptive AgentsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansPregnancyPregnancy RateContraceptive Agentsabortioncontraceptioncontraceptive devicescopper intrauterine devicesfamily planning servicesintrauterine deviceslong-acting reversible contraceptivesmedicated intrauterine devices

Identifiers

PMID37614066
PMCPMC10619601
OpenAlexW4386116665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.