Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37612704›Full record

ReviewGlobalization and health2023

Brexit, trade and the governance of non-communicable diseases: a research agenda.

Benjamin Hawkins, Pepita Barlow, May Ci van Schalkwyk, Chris Holden

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Globalization and health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin HawkinsMRC Epidemiology Unity, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. Ben.hawkins@mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7027-8046
Pepita BarlowDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
May Ci van SchalkwykLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Chris HoldenSchool for Business and Society, University of York, York, UK.
London School of Economics and Political Science · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00006/7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe UK's post-Brexit trade strategy has potentially important implications for population health and equity. In particular, it will impact on the structural risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including the consumption of health-harming commodities such as tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food and beverages. This article catalogues recent developments in UK trade policy. It then presents a narrative review of the existing research literature on trade and health and previous, prospective studies on the health impacts of Brexit. In so doing it identifies key questions and foci for a future research agenda on the implications of UK's emerging trade regime for NCD prevention. MAIN TEXT: We identify five key areas for future research. (1) Additional scholarship to document the health effects of key trade agreements negotiated by the UK government; (2) The implications of these agreements for policy-making to address health impacts, including the potential for legal challenges under dispute settlement mechanisms; (3) The strategic objectives being pursued by the UK government and the extent to which they support or undermine public health; (4) The process of trade policy-making, its openness to public health interests and actors and the impact of the political and ideological legacy of Brexit on outcomes; (5) The impact of the UK's post-Brexit trade policy on partner countries and blocs and their cumulative impact on the global trade regime.

conclusionsFurther research is urgently need to understand the ways in which the UK's post-Brexit trade strategy will impact on NCDs and policy responses to address these, including the openness of the trade policy architecture to health issues. The outcomes of this process will have wider systemic effects on the global trade regime with implications for health. Researchers must be cognizant of the ideological components of the policy debate which have been absent from previous analysis of Brexit, trade and health.

Indexed as

Noncommunicable DiseasesBeveragesEuropean UnionHumansProspective StudiesUnited KingdomBrexitHealthIndustryNon-communicable diseasesPolicy-makingTradeUK.

Identifiers

PMID37612704
PMCPMC10463402
OpenAlexW4386099941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.