Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37612679›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Rare diseases: why is a rapid referral to an expert center so important?

Tina Willmen, Lukas Willmen, Anne Pankow, Simon Ronicke, Heinz Gabriel, Annette Doris Wagner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tina WillmenDepartment of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Lukas WillmenDepartment of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Anne PankowDepartment of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Simon RonickeMedical Clinic for Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Heinz GabrielPractice for Human Genetics Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Annette Doris WagnerDepartment of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany. Wagner.annette@mh-hannover.de.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with rare diseases usually go through years of diagnostic odysseys. The large number of rare diseases and the associated lack of expertise pose a major challenge to physicians. There are few physicians dealing with patients with rare diseases and they usually work in a limited number of specialized centers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of an expert center.

methodsThe diagnostic pathway of 78 patients of the outpatient clinic for rare inflammatory systemic diseases with renal involvement was analyzed retrospectively. For this purpose, each examination day was documented with the corresponding examinations performed from the onset of initial symptoms. Three time points were considered: The time when patients first visited a physician with symptoms, the time when patients consulted an expert, and the time when they received the correct diagnosis. In addition, it was documented whether the diagnosis could be made without the expert, or only with the help of the expert. The examinations that confirmed the diagnosis were also documented for each patient.

resultsA correct diagnosis was made without the help of the expert in only 21% of cases. Each patient visited an average of 6 physicians before consulting the expert. Targeted diagnostics enabled the expert to make the correct diagnosis with an average of seven visits, or one inpatient stay. However, referral to the expert took an average of 4 years.

conclusionThe data show that rapid and targeted diagnostics were possible in the expert center due to the available expertise and the interdisciplinary exchange. Early diagnosis is of great importance for many patients, as an early and correct therapy can be decisive for the course of the disease.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesRare DiseasesHumansPhysical ExaminationReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesDiagnostic odysseysDiagnosticsPreventionRare diseasesTarget-oriented diagnostic procedures

Identifiers

PMID37612679
PMCPMC10463573
OpenAlexW4386100644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.