Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37612624›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2023

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of high-risk, early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Javier Cortes, Amin Haiderali, Min Huang, Wilbur Pan, Peter Schmid, Katherine G Akers, Julie E Park, Andrew M Frederickson, Peter A Fasching, Joyce O'Shaughnessy

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Mitigating Chemotherapy Toxicities in Breast Cancer: The Potential of Arglabin Therapy.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Javier CortesOncology Department, International Breast Cancer Center, Pangaea Oncology, Quiron Group, Barcelona, Spain.
Amin HaideraliMerck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA. amin.haiderali@merck.com.
Min HuangMerck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Wilbur PanMerck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Peter SchmidBarts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Katherine G AkersPRECISIONheor, New York, NY, USA.
Julie E ParkPRECISIONheor, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Andrew M FredericksonPRECISIONheor, New York, NY, USA.
Peter A FaschingDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen, EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen, Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Joyce O'ShaughnessyBaylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology and US Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USBaylor University Medical Center · USComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen · DEQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversidad Europea de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are generally younger and more likely to experience disease recurrence and have the shortest survival among all breast cancer patients. Recently, neoadjuvant delivery of the programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab was approved for patients with high-risk, early-stage TNBC, but this treatment regimen has not been evaluated in head-to-head trials with other neoadjuvant treatment regimens. Therefore, the objective of this study was to estimate the relative efficacy of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab versus other neoadjuvant treatments for early-stage TNBC through a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA).

methodsEMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, conference abstracts, and clinical trial registries were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating neoadjuvant treatments for early-stage TNBC. NMA was performed to estimate relative treatment effects among evaluated interventions.

resultsFive trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in the NMA. The relative efficacy of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab was favorable to paclitaxel followed by anthracycline + cyclophosphamide in terms of pathologic complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival; paclitaxel + carboplatin followed by anthracycline + cyclophosphamide in terms of pCR and EFS; paclitaxel + bevacizumab followed by anthracycline + cyclophosphamide + bevacizumab in terms of pCR; and paclitaxel + carboplatin + veliparib followed by anthracycline + cyclophosphamide in terms of EFS.

conclusionsNeoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab confers benefits in response and survival outcomes versus alternative neoadjuvant treatments for early-stage TNBC.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnthracyclinesBevacizumabCarboplatinCyclophosphamideHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPaclitaxelAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnthracyclinesBevacizumabCarboplatinCyclophosphamidePaclitaxelChemotherapyImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant therapyNetwork meta-analysisPD-1PD-L1Triple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID37612624
PMCPMC10463750
OpenAlexW4386099388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.