Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37612611›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2023

Comparison of frontal QRS-T angle of patients with nasal septal deviation with healthy controls.

Olga Bayar Kapıcı, Sabri Abuş, Selçuk Ayhan, Mehtap Koparal, Hakan Kaya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Olga Bayar KapıcıDepartment of Radiology, Adiyaman University Education and Research Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey. olgasahbayar@gmail.com.
Sabri AbuşDepartment of Cardiology, Adiyaman University Education and Research Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey.
Selçuk AyhanDepartment of Cardiology, Adiyaman University Education and Research Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey.
Mehtap KoparalDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Adiyaman University Education and Research Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey.
Hakan KayaDepartment of Cardiology, Adiyaman University Education and Research Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey.
Adıyaman University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study compares frontal QRS-T angle (fQRS-T) in electrocardiogram (ECG) examinations of people with nasal septal deviation (NSD) with healthy controls (HC).

methodsEighty-two patients whom a radiologist with paranasal computed tomography definitively diagnosed with NSD were included in the study. 101 individuals without NSD were selected as HC.

resultsCompared to the HC group, the fQRS-T in was considerably wider in patients with NSD (p < .001). According to Spearman correlation analysis, fQRS-T and NSD angle, and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were significantly correlated (p = .021, p < .001, and p = .003, respectively). In linear regression analysis where the fQRS-T was taken as a dependent variable, NSD angle and PLR predicted the fQRS-T significantly and positively (F(5.76) = 8.451, R2 = 0.357, Adjusted R2 = 0.315 and p < .001).

conclusionIn this study, fQRS-T was significantly higher in patients with NSD. In future studies, fQRS-T can be compared before and after septoplasty in NSD patients.

Indexed as

Blood PlateletsElectrocardiographyHumansLinear ModelsPatientsPhysical ExaminationCardiovascular disease riskFrontal QRS-T angleNasal septal deviation

Identifiers

PMID37612611
PMCPMC10464060
OpenAlexW4386090617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.