Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37612594›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2023

Socioeconomic inequalities in modern contraceptive use among women in Benin: a decomposition analysis.

Eugene Budu, Louis Kobina Dadzie, Tarif Salihu, Bright Opoku Ahinkorah, Edward Kwabena Ameyaw, Richard Gyan Aboagye, Abdul-Aziz Seidu, Sanni Yaya

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Eugene BuduKorle Bu Teaching Hospital, P. O. Box, 77, Accra, Ghana.
Louis Kobina DadzieDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Tarif SalihuDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Bright Opoku AhinkorahSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Edward Kwabena AmeyawInstitute of Policy Studies and School of Graduate Studies, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong.
Richard Gyan AboagyeDepartment of Family and Community Health, Fred N. Binka School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Abdul-Aziz SeiduREMS Consult Limited, Sekondi-Takoradi, Western Region, Ghana.
Sanni YayaSchool of International Development and Global Studies, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, K1N 6N5, Canada. sanni.yaya@uOttawa.ca.
University of Cape Coast · GHJames Cook University · AUKorle Bu Teaching Hospital · GHTakoradi Technical University · GHUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences · GHUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContraceptive use is crucial to achieving Sustainable Development Goal 3. Evidence of socioeconomic inequality in the use of modern contraceptives is essential to address the developing inequality in its utilisation given the low prevalence of contraceptive use among women in Benin. This study examined the socioeconomic inequalities in modern contraceptive use among women in Benin.

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of the 2017-18 Benin Demographic and Health Survey data. A weighted sample of 7,360 sexually active women of reproductive age was included in the study. We used a concentration curve to plot the cumulative proportion of women using modern contraception. Decomposition analysis was conducted to determine factors accounting for the socioeconomic disparities in modern contraceptive use.

resultsWe noted that the richest women had higher odds of modern contraceptive use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.67, CI = 1.22-2.30) compared to the poorest women. Other factors that showed significant associations with modern contraception use were age, marital status, religious affiliation, employment status, parity, women's educational level, and ethnicity. We found that modern contraceptive use is highly concentrated among the rich, with rich women having a higher propensity of using modern contraception relative to the poor. Also, the disadvantaged to modern contraceptive use included the poor, those aged 45-49, married women, those working, those with four or more live births, rural residents, and women of Bariba and related ethnicity. Conversely, favourable concentration in modern contraceptive use was found among the rich, women aged 20-24, the divorced, women with two live births, the highly educated, those with media exposure, and women of Yoruba and related ethnicity.

conclusionThe study has shown that wealthy women are more likely to utilize contraceptives than the poor. This is because wealthy women could afford both the service itself and the travel costs to the health facility, hence overcoming any economic barriers to using modern contraception. Other factors such as age, marital status, religion, employment status, parity, mother's educational level, and ethnicity were associated with contraceptive use in Benin. The Benin government and other stakeholders should develop family planning intercession techniques that address both the supply and demand sides of the equation, with a focus on reaching the illiterate and under-resourced population without admittance to modern contraception.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraceptive AgentsBeninCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHumansPregnancyContraceptive AgentsBeninDemographic and Health SurveyInequalityModern contraceptiveSocioeconomic

Identifiers

PMID37612594
PMCPMC10463475
OpenAlexW4386085751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.