Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37612545›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2023

Safety aspects, probiotic potentials of yeast and lactobacillus isolated from fermented foods in North-Eastern India, and its anti-inflammatory activity.

Subrota Hati, Krupali Ramanuj, Bethsheba Basaiawmoit, V Sreeja, Ruchika Maurya, Mahendra Bishnoi, Kanthi Kiran Kondepudi, Birendrakumar Mishra

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characterizing probiotic properties of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ABO1 strain isolated from toddy palm nectar.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Isolation and characterization of novelJournal of food science and technology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Subrota HatiDairy Microbiology Department, SMC College of Dairy Science, Kamdhenu University, Anand, Gujarat, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4010-204X
Krupali RamanujDairy Microbiology Department, SMC College of Dairy Science, Kamdhenu University, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Bethsheba BasaiawmoitDepartment of Rural Development and Agricultural Production, North-Eastern Hill University, Tura Campus, Tura, Meghalaya, India.
V SreejaDairy Microbiology Department, SMC College of Dairy Science, Kamdhenu University, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Ruchika MauryaRegional Center for Biotechnology, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Mahendra BishnoiHealthy Gut Research Group, Food and Nutritional Biotechnology Division, National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Knowledge City, Punjab, India.
Kanthi Kiran KondepudiHealthy Gut Research Group, Food and Nutritional Biotechnology Division, National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Knowledge City, Punjab, India.
Birendrakumar MishraDepartment of Rural Development and Agricultural Production, North-Eastern Hill University, Tura Campus, Tura, Meghalaya, India. birendramishra14@gmail.com.
Kamdhenu University · INNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute · INNorth Eastern Hill University · INRegional Centre for Biotechnology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactobacillus and yeast obtained from fermented foods in North-East India were tested for safety and probiotic properties. All the lactobacilli and yeast tested negative for the catalase, indole, urease, phenylalanine, hemolysis, gelatin hydrolysis, and biogenic amine production tests, indicating that they are safe to use as probiotics in food supplements. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum KGL3A (accession no. MG722814) was capable of resisting the replicated gastric fluid (pH 2) till 2 h of exposure, whereas both KGL3A and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus K4E (accession no. KX950834.1) strains were able to resist pH 3 till 2 h of exposure with a reduction in overall viable cell count from 7.48 log CFU/mL to 1.09 log CFU/mL and 7.77 log CFU/mL to 0.83 log CFU/mL, respectively. In vitro gastric juice simulation conditions were tolerated by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae WBS2A. The cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH) towards hydrocarbons (n-hexadecane) was seen highest in L. plantarum KGL3A (77.16± 0.84%) and Limosilactobacillus fermentum KGL4 accession no. MF951099 (72.60 ± 2.33%). The percentage auto-aggregation ranged from 8.70 to 25.53 after 2 h, which significantly increased to 10.50 to 26.94 during the fifth hour for cultures. Also, a higher percentage of co-aggregation was found for the culture L. rhamnosus K4E with S. typhi (34.18 ± 0.03%), E. coli (32.97 ± 0.02 %) and S. aureus (26.33 ± 0.06 %) and for the yeast S. cerevisiae WBS2A, a higher percentage of co-aggregation was found with Listeria monocytogenes (25.77 ± 0.22%). The antioxidant activity and proteolytic activity were found to be higher for Lactobacillus helveticus K14 and L. rhamnosus K4E. The proportion of decreased cholesterol was noticeably higher in KGL4 (29.65 ± 4.30%). β glucosidase activity was significantly higher in the L. fermentum KGL4 strain (0.359 ± 0.002), and α galactosidase activity was significantly higher in the L. rhamnosus K4E strain (0.415 ± 0.016). MTT assays suggested that KGL4 and WBS2A at a lower dose did not exhibit cytotoxicity.

Indexed as

Fermented FoodsProbioticsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsEscherichia coliLactobacillusSaccharomyces cerevisiaeStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAnti-inflammatoryFermented foodsLactobacillusProbioticsSafetyYeast

Identifiers

PMID37612545
PMCPMC10485210
OpenAlexW4386086048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.