Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37612458›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2023

A 3D-printed multi-compartment device that enables dynamic PK/PD profiles of antibiotics.

Andrew A Heller, Morgan K Geiger, Dana M Spence

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew A HellerDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Morgan K GeigerInstitute for Quantitative Health Sciences & Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Dana M SpenceDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. spenceda@msu.edu.
Michigan State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathogens develop resistance to various drugs while under the selective pressure of antibiotics resulting in the emergence of bacterial strains that are resistant to multiple treatment options. Unfortunately, the resistance to antibiotics has also been accompanied by a reduction in the development of novel antibiotics to combat various pathogens. Current diagnostic tools, which are used in parts of the early developmental process of antibiotics, primarily consist of static susceptibility tests that do not resemble the pharmacokinetics of the therapy in vivo. Here, we designed and 3D-printed cubical inserts with membranes on two of the cube faces that allow diffusion of a molecule across two planes. These inserts are used with a 3D-printed device to create a two-compartment model to mimic the pharmacokinetics of a molecule in humans from multiple types of administration. Fluorescein was used to characterize the device and the diffusion of molecules from a flowing channel, through a membrane in the first plane (representing the primary compartment in vivo, or plasma), followed by measurement in the second compartment (that represents the interstitial fluid). The dynamic, two-compartment model was tested using both gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial strains in the secondary compartment. The ATP/OD600 (a measure of antibiotic activity) of a kanamycin-resistant E. coli strain challenged with the antibiotic levofloxacin increased after reaching an effective concentration of the antibiotic at 2 h, equating to a secondary compartment concentration of 3.5 ± 1.3 µM levofloxacin. The ATP/OD600 of a chloramphenicol-resistant B. subtilis strain challenged with the antibiotic levofloxacin remained steady or increased slightly after reaching an effective concentration of the antibiotic. The earliest statistical difference was detected 3 h after the start of the PK curve, which corresponds with a secondary compartment concentration of 4.8 ± 1.8 µM levofloxacin. Our results demonstrate that a fabricated 2-compartment model (1) provides realistic PK values to those published from in vivo studies and (2) can be used to determine antibiotic pharmacodynamics.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsLevofloxacinAdenosine TriphosphateEscherichia coliHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPrinting, Three-DimensionalAdenosine TriphosphateAnti-Bacterial AgentsLevofloxacin3D-printingAntibioticDynamicMembranePK/PDSusceptibility

Identifiers

PMID37612458
OpenAlexW4386100605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.