Observational studyJournal of anesthesia2023
Singleton pregnancy using in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection does not increase risk of bleeding in cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study.
Observational study in Journal of anesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative and calculated estimated blood loss in cesarean deliveries for twin and singleton pregnancies: a retrospective analysis.Journal of anesthesia · 2024Article
- Reply to a letter to the editor.Journal of anesthesia · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSeveral studies indicate that assisted reproductive technology (ART) including in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) pregnancies carries increased risk of complications including postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). However, the association between IVF/ICSI and the bleeding risk particularly in cesarean delivery has not been systematically assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate bleeding risk during and after cesarean delivery in parturients who conceived using IVF or ICSI.
methodsThis is a retrospective observational study analyzing data from 310 parturients who underwent cesarean delivery: 155 who had conceived using IVF or ICSI (IVF/ICSI group) and 155 age and year of delivery matched controls who had conceived spontaneously (control group). The primary outcome measure was the amount of blood lost during and within 24 h after cesarean delivery. Secondary outcome measure was the incidence of severe PPH. With 132 parturients in each group, we had 90% power to detect a 200 mL difference in the bleeding amount, at a 0.05 two-sided significance level.
resultsThe amount of bleeding in the IVF/ICSI group was 1234 ± 669 mL, which was 124 mL (11.2%) greater than that in the control group (95% CI - 34 to 282; p = 0.12). The incidence of severe PPH in the IVF/ICSI group and in the control group was 23.9% and 16.8%, respectively (p = 0.16), and the unadjusted odds ratio was 1.6 (95% CI, 0.9-2.7; p = 0.12). No significant independent effect of IVF/ICSI on the bleeding amount and the incidence of severe PPH was observed in multivariable regression analyses (p = 0.22, p = 0.16).
conclusionIn this study, IVF and ICSI were not associated with increasing risk of bleeding in cesarean delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.