ArticleScientific reports2023
Improved EEG-based emotion recognition through information enhancement in connectivity feature map.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electroencephalography-Based Emotion Recognition Using Auditory Stimulation for Affective Brain-Computer Interfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A multi-task EEG emotion recognition method based on emotion-dimension coupling constraints.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Nightingale: A multimodal approach combining EEG signals and audio features to enhance music therapy.PloS one · 2026Article
- Enhancing EEG-Based Emotion Detection with Hybrid Models: Insights from DEAP Dataset Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Resource-Efficient Multi-Entropy Fusion Method and Its Application for EEG-Based Emotion Recognition.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- EEG-based emotion recognition using multi-scale dynamic CNN and gated transformer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Information-Theoretical Analysis of the Cycle of Creation of Knowledge and Meaning in Brains under Multiple Cognitive Modalities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Neurocognitive responses to spatial design behaviors and tools among interior architecture students: a pilot study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A novel methodology for emotion recognition through 62-lead EEG signals: multilevel heterogeneous recurrence analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Attention-based multi-feature fusion neuromarker for EEG-driven stress classification in learners.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG), despite its inherited complexity, is a preferable brain signal for automatic human emotion recognition (ER), which is a challenging machine learning task with emerging applications. In any automatic ER, machine learning (ML) models classify emotions using the extracted features from the EEG signals, and therefore, such feature extraction is a crucial part of ER process. Recently, EEG channel connectivity features have been widely used in ER, where Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), mutual information (MI), phase-locking value (PLV), and transfer entropy (TE) are well-known methods for connectivity feature map (CFM) construction. CFMs are typically formed in a two-dimensional configuration using the signals from two EEG channels, and such two-dimensional CFMs are usually symmetric and hold redundant information. This study proposes the construction of a more informative CFM that can lead to better ER. Specifically, the proposed innovative technique intelligently combines CFMs' measures of two different individual methods, and its outcomes are more informative as a fused CFM. Such CFM fusion does not incur additional computational costs in training the ML model. In this study, fused CFMs are constructed by combining every pair of methods from PCC, PLV, MI, and TE; and the resulting fused CFMs PCC + PLV, PCC + MI, PCC + TE, PLV + MI, PLV + TE, and MI + TE are used to classify emotion by convolutional neural network. Rigorous experiments on the DEAP benchmark EEG dataset show that the proposed CFMs deliver better ER performances than CFM with a single connectivity method (e.g., PCC). At a glance, PLV + MI-based ER is shown to be the most promising one as it outperforms the other methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.