ArticleScientific reports2023
Development and validation of a machine learning-based prognostic risk stratification model for acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guidelines for Neuroprognostication in Critically ill Adults with Acute Ischemic Stroke.Neurocritical care · 2026Guideline
- Interpretable Machine Learning for Stroke Recovery: Predicting Discharge and 3-Month Functional Outcomes.NeuroRehabilitation · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning-based predictive model for breast cancer bone metastasis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning-based prediction of 90-day mortality after endovascular treatment in acute large vessel occlusion stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Imaging research, diagnosis, and treatment advances of post-stroke cognitive impairment.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2026Review
- XGBoost model for predicting erectile dysfunction risk after radical prostatectomy: development and validation using machine learning.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Lung Cancer Biomarkers Associated with Increased Peripheral Arterial Stiffness in Middle-aged Chinese Adults.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2025Article
- Interpretable prediction of stroke prognosis: SHAP for SVM and nomogram for logistic regression.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Knowledge map of artificial intelligence in neurodegenerative diseases: a decade-long bibliometric and visualization study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Stroke Prognosis and Prediction in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The impact of dysbiosis in oropharyngeal and gut microbiota on systemic inflammatory response and short-term prognosis in acute ischemic stroke with preceding infection.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Assessing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Age with Intracranial Vessel Tortuosity and Thickness Information.Brain sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a most prevalent cause of serious long-term disability worldwide. Accurate prediction of stroke prognosis is highly valuable for effective intervention and treatment. As such, the present retrospective study aims to provide a reliable machine learning-based model for prognosis prediction in AIS patients. Data from AIS patients were collected retrospectively from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between August 2017 and July 2019. Independent prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic analysis and used to develop machine learning (ML) models. The ML model performance was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and radar plot. Shapley Additive explanations (SHAP) values were used to interpret the importance of all features included in the predictive model. A total of 677 AIS patients were included in the present study. Poor prognosis was observed in 209 patients (30.9%). Six variables, including neuron specific enolase (NSE), homocysteine (HCY), S-100β, dysphagia, C-reactive protein (CRP), and anticoagulation were included to establish ML models. Six different ML algorithms were tested, and Random Forest model was selected as the final predictive model with the greatest AUC of 0.908. Moreover, according to SHAP results, NSE impacted the predictive model the most, followed by HCY, S-100β, dysphagia, CRP and anticoagulation. Based on the RF model, an online tool was constructed to predict the prognosis of AIS patients and assist clinicians in optimizing patient treatment. The present study revealed that NSE, HCY, CRP, S-100β, anticoagulation, and dysphagia were important factors for poor prognosis in AIS patients. ML algorithms were used to develop predictive models for predicting the prognosis of AIS patients, with the RF model presenting the optimal performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.