ArticleScientific data2023
Making Biomedical Research Software FAIR: Actionable Step-by-step Guidelines with a User-support Tool.
Article in Scientific data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dataset documentation for responsible AI: analysis of suitability and usage for health datasets.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- PDBe-SIFTS: an open-source tool for Structure Integration with Function, Taxonomy, and Sequences, featuring improved alignment, scoring scheme, and accelerated search.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- FAIR m-BIDS: Advancing brain data utilization through multimodal and FAIR principles.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Building and Sustaining Open-Source Medical Device Projects.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025Review
- rcsb-api: Python Toolkit for Streamlining Access to RCSB Protein Data Bank APIs.Journal of molecular biology · 2025Article
- Publicly available imaging datasets for age-related macular degeneration: Evaluation according to the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) principles.Experimental eye research · 2025Review
- Pressure-Flow Relation of Porcine Thoracic Duct Segment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- AI-READI: rethinking AI data collection, preparation and sharing in diabetes research and beyond.Nature metabolism · 2024Article
- From the establishment of a national bioinformatics society to the development of a national bioinformatics infrastructure.F1000Research · 2024Article
- The five pillars of computational reproducibility: bioinformatics and beyond.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Making Biomedical Research Software FAIR: Actionable Step-by-step Guidelines with a User-support Tool.Scientific data · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) guiding principles tailored for research software have been proposed by the FAIR for Research Software (FAIR4RS) Working Group. They provide a foundation for optimizing the reuse of research software. The FAIR4RS principles are, however, aspirational and do not provide practical instructions to the researchers. To fill this gap, we propose in this work the first actionable step-by-step guidelines for biomedical researchers to make their research software compliant with the FAIR4RS principles. We designate them as the FAIR Biomedical Research Software (FAIR-BioRS) guidelines. Our process for developing these guidelines, presented here, is based on an in-depth study of the FAIR4RS principles and a thorough review of current practices in the field. To support researchers, we have also developed a workflow that streamlines the process of implementing these guidelines. This workflow is incorporated in FAIRshare, a free and open-source software application aimed at simplifying the curation and sharing of FAIR biomedical data and software through user-friendly interfaces and automation. Details about this tool are also presented.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.