Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37612234›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurogastroenterology and motility2023

A Higher Manometric Esophageal Length to Height Ratio in Achalasia Explains the Lower Prevalence of Hiatal Hernia.

Enrique Coss-Adame, Janette Furuzawa-Carballeda, Andric C Perez-Ortiz, Ana López-Ruiz, Miguel A Valdovinos, Josué Sánchez-Gómez, José Peralta-Figueroa, Héctor Olvera-Prado, Fidel López-Verdugo, Sofía Narváez-Chávez and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Enrique Coss-AdameDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8569-2792
Janette Furuzawa-CarballedaDepartment of Experimental Surgery, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5804-7221
Andric C Perez-OrtizSchool of Medicine, Universidad Panamericana, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0731-2464
Ana López-RuizDepartment of Experimental Surgery, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.
Miguel A ValdovinosDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6676-1433
Josué Sánchez-GómezDepartment of Experimental Surgery, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.
José Peralta-FigueroaDepartment of Experimental Surgery, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.
Héctor Olvera-PradoDepartment of Experimental Surgery, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.
Fidel López-VerdugoDepartment of Experimental Surgery, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.
Sofía Narváez-ChávezDepartment of Experimental Surgery, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ó Scar Santés-JassoDepartment of Surgery, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.
Diana Aguilar-LeónDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.
Gonzalo Torres-VillalobosDepartment of Experimental Surgery, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0466-5857
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán · MXUniversidad Panamericana · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: The evidence suggests that a shorter esophageal length (EL) in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients is associated with the presence of hiatal hernia (HH). However, there are no reports of this association in patients with achalasia. The aim is to (1) determine the prevalence of hiatal hernia in achalasia patients, (2) compare achalasia EL with GERD patients and healthy volunteers (HV), (3) measure achalasia manometric esophageal length to height (MELH) ratio, and (4) determine if there are differences in symptoms between patients with and without hiatal hernia. Methods: This retrospective and cross-sectional study consist of 87 pre-surgical achalasia patients, 22 GERD patients, and 30 HV. High-resolution manometry (HRM), barium swallow, and upper endoscopy were performed to diagnose HH. The EL and MELH ratio were measured by HRM. Symptoms were assessed with Eckardt, Eating Assessment Tool, and GERD-health-related quality of life questionnaires. Results: The HH in GERD's prevalence was 73% vs 3% in achalasia patients ( Conclusions: The prevalence of HH in achalasia is significantly lower than in GERD. The longer EL and the higher MELH ratio in achalasia could explain the lower prevalence of HH. Despite the low prevalence of HH in achalasia patients, the surgeon should be encouraged not to rule out HH since the risk of postoperative reflux may increase if this condition is not identified and corrected.

Indexed as

Cross-sectional studiesEsophageal achalasiaEsophageal lengthGastroesophageal refluxHiatal hernia

Identifiers

PMID37612234
PMCPMC10577459
OpenAlexW4386089601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.