Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37612144›Full record

ArticleCold Spring Harbor protocols2024

Taste Sensory Responses in Mosquitoes.

Adriana Medina Lomelí, Anupama Arun Dahanukar

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cold Spring Harbor protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adriana Medina LomelíEntomology Graduate Program, Cell and Systems Biology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA.
Anupama Arun DahanukarDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA anupama.dahanukar@ucr.edu.
University of California, Riverside · US

Funding

The neural basis of fatty acid tasteR01DC017390 · NIDCD · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI DAHANUKAR, ANUPAMA ARUN, KEENE, ALEX C · 2018 to 2022
$1.5M
Human sweat taste and contact-guided behavior in Aedes aegyptiR21AI171913 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI DAHANUKAR, ANUPAMA ARUN · 2022 to 2023
$428k
Investigation of meal destination in Aedes aegyptiR21AI140065 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI DAHANUKAR, ANUPAMA ARUN · 2018 to 2019
$428k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI140065NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI171913NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of taste sensory responses has been a powerful approach for understanding principles of taste detection and coding. The shared architecture of external taste sensing units, called sensilla, in insects opened up the study of tastant-evoked responses in any model of choice using a single-sensillum tip recording method that was developed in the mid-1900s. Early studies in blowflies were instrumental for identifying distinct taste neurons based on their responses to specific categories of chemicals. Broader system-wide analyses of whole organs have since been performed in the genetic model insect

Indexed as

CulicidaeSensillaTasteAnimals

Identifiers

PMID37612144
PMCPMC12416353
OpenAlexW4386117200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.