Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37612138›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Implementing psychological support for health and social care staff affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative exploration of staff well-being hubs ('Resilience Hubs') using normalisation process theory.

Kate Allsopp, Filippo Varese, Paul French, Hannah White, Priscilla Chung, Alysha A Hassan, Sally-Anne Wright, Ellie Young, Alan Barrett, Gita Bhutani and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Kate AllsoppComplex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK kate.allsopp@gmmh.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5093-0404
Filippo VareseComplex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7244-598X
Paul FrenchFaculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Hannah WhiteComplex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3944-4277
Priscilla ChungLancashire and South Cumbria Resilience Hub, Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, UK.
Alysha A HassanCheshire and Merseyside Resilience Hub, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9102-7812
Sally-Anne WrightLancashire and South Cumbria Resilience Hub, Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, UK.
Ellie YoungGreater Manchester Resilience Hub, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK.
Alan BarrettGreater Manchester Resilience Hub, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK.
Gita BhutaniLancashire and South Cumbria Resilience Hub, Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, UK.
Katherine McGuirkGreater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership, Manchester, UK.
Fay HuntleyCheshire and Merseyside Resilience Hub, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
May SarsamCheshire and Merseyside Resilience Hub, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Hein Ten CateLancashire and South Cumbria Resilience Hub, Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, UK.
Ruth WatsonGreater Manchester Resilience Hub, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK.
Jenni WillbournGreater Manchester Resilience Hub, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK.
Daniel HindSchool of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6409-4793
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBLancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust · GBMersey Care NHS Trust · GBPennine Care NHS Foundation Trust · GBManchester Metropolitan University · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEvaluate the implementation of Hubs providing access to psychological support for health and social care keyworkers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

designQualitative interviews informed by normalisation process theory to understand how the Hub model became embedded into normal practice, and factors that disrupted normalisation of this approach.

settingThree Resilience Hubs in the North of England.

participantsHub staff, keyworkers who accessed Hub support (Hub clients), keyworkers who had not accessed a Hub, and wider stakeholders involved in the provision of staff support within the health and care system (N=63).

resultsHubs were generally seen as an effective way of supporting keyworkers, and Hub clients typically described very positive experiences. Flexibility and adaptability to local needs were strongly valued. Keyworkers accessed support when they understood the offer, valuing a confidential service that was separate from their organisation. Confusion about how Hubs differed from other support prevented some from enrolling. Beliefs about job roles, unsupportive managers, negative workplace cultures and systemic issues prevented keyworkers from valuing mental health support. Lack of support from managers discouraged keyworker engagement with Hubs. Black, Asian and minority ethnic keyworkers impacted by racism felt that the Hubs did not always meet their needs.

conclusionsHubs were seen as a valuable, responsive and distinct part of the health and care system. Findings highlight the importance of improving promotion and accessibility of Hubs, and continuation of confidential Hub support. Policy implications for the wider health and care sector include the central importance of genuine promotion of and value placed on mental health support by health and social care management, and the creation of psychologically safe work environments. Diversity and cultural competency training is needed to better reach under-represented communities. Findings are consistent with the international literature, therefore, likely to have applicability outside of the current context.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PersonnelPandemicsPsychosocial Support SystemsSocial WorkersAsianBlack PeopleCounselingHumansMinority GroupsOccupational StressSocial SupportUnited KingdomCOVID-19healthcare staffimplementationmental health servicesqualitative

Identifiers

PMID37612138
PMCPMC10450134
OpenAlexW4386102996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.