Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37611854›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics2023

Olfactory drug delivery with intranasal sprays after nasal midvault reconstruction.

Harry Chiang, Hannah L Martin, Ryan M Sicard, Dennis O Frank-Ito

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nasal airway obstruction in patients with cleft lip nasal deformity: A systematic review.Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harry ChiangDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: harry.chiang@duke.edu.
Hannah L MartinDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Ryan M SicardDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Dennis O Frank-ItoDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · US

Funding

Computational modeling of the mature unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity for objective assessment of patient nasal function and treatment outcomesR01DE028554 · NIDCR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FRANK-ITO, DENNIS ONYEKA · 2019 to 2022
$1.7M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE028554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conductive olfaction and nose to brain drug delivery are important processes that remain limited by inadequate odorant or drug delivery to the olfactory airspace. Primary challenges include anatomic barriers and poor targeting to the olfactory region. This study uses computational fluid dynamics to investigate the effects of nasal midvault surgery on olfactory drug delivery with intranasal sprays. Soft tissue elevation, spreader flaps, and spreader grafts were performed on two fresh cadaveric specimens, using computed tomography for airway reconstruction. Nasal airflow and drug particle transport simulations were performed under these conditions: inhalation rate (15, 30 L/min), spray velocity (1, 5, 10 m/s), spray location (top, bottom, center, medial, lateral), head position (upright, supine, forward, backward), and particle size (1-100 µm). Simulation results were used to calculate drug particle deposition to the olfactory airspaces and bulbs. Total olfactory deposition was < 5% but attained a maximum of 36.33% when sorted by particle size. There was no association between nasal midvault surgery and olfactory deposition. No single parameter or technique demonstrated superior olfactory deposition, but smaller particle size, slower spray velocity, and higher inhalation rate tended to optimize olfactory deposition, providing important implications for future intranasal spray and drug design to target the olfactory airspace.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsSmellBiological TransportBrainHumansNoseDrug DeliveryIntranasalMidvault ReconstructionNose to BrainOlfactionRhinoplasty

Identifiers

PMID37611854
PMCPMC10621325
OpenAlexW4386034751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.