Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37611566›Full record

ArticleJournal of intellectual disabilities : JOID2026

Understanding the contribution of intellectual disabilities nurses: Paper 3 of 4 - evaluation.

Kay Mafuba, Joann Kiernan, Chiedza Kudita, Hazel M Chapman, Dorothy Kupara, Rebecca Chester

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intellectual disabilities : JOID, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kay MafubaUniversity of West London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2184-9623
Joann KiernanEdge Hill Universityand Alder Hey Children's Hospital, UK.
Chiedza KuditaUniversity of West London, UK.
Hazel M ChapmanUniversity of Chester, UK.
Dorothy KuparaUniversity of West London, UK.
Rebecca ChesterBerkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
University of West London · GBBerkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Chester · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The overall objective of this research was to identify intellectual disability nursing interventions and their impact on the health and healthcare of people with intellectual disability. This is part 3 of a 4-part series. In this paper we report the findings from quantitative questions from an online survey of intellectual disability nurses. The objective of this part of the study was to a evaluate intellectual disability nurses' confidence in their understanding of the interventions they undertook. Quantitative data was collected using an online survey questionnaire from a voluntary response and snowball sample of 230 participants from 7 countries. Thematic, descriptive statistical, and inferential statistical analyses were undertaken. The evaluation data suggest and demonstrate a lack of clarity among intellectual disability nurses of the interventions they can effectively undertake. There appears to be correlations between lack of role clarity and the types of employer organisations and countries. Further work need to be undertaken by nurse leaders ascertain and address this lack of clarity.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelIntellectual DisabilityNursesAdultHumanseffectuating nursing proceduresenhancing impactenhancing quality of lifeintellectual disabilitynursing procedures

Identifiers

PMID37611566
PMCPMC13230659
OpenAlexW4386085572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.