Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37611159›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2023

Promoting health in the digital environment: health policy experts' responses to on-demand delivery in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Christina McKerchar, Susan Bidwell, Angela Curl, Tessa Pocock, Matt Cowie, Hannah Miles, Rose Crossin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christina McKercharDepartment of Population Health, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Susan BidwellDepartment of Population Health, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Angela CurlDepartment of Population Health, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8325-190X
Tessa PocockDepartment of Population Health, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Matt CowieUniversity of Otago Medical School, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Hannah MilesUniversity of Otago Medical School, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Rose CrossinDepartment of Population Health, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1814-1330

Funding

Lottery Health Research 2022-185288University of Otago Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Services offering on-demand delivery of unhealthy commodities, such as fast food, alcohol and smoking/vaping products have proliferated in recent years. It is well known that the built environment can be health promoting or harmful to health, but there has been less consideration of the digital environment. Increased availability and accessibility of these commodities may be associated with increased consumption, with harmful public health implications. Policy regulating the supply of these commodities was developed before the introduction of on-demand services and has not kept pace with the digital environment. This paper reports on semi-structured interviews with health policy experts on the health harms of the uptake in on-demand delivery of food, alcohol and smoking/vaping products, along with their views on policies that might mitigate these harms. We interviewed 14 policy experts from central and local government agencies and ministries, health authorities, non-Government Organisations (NGOs) and university research positions in Aotearoa New Zealand using a purposive sampling strategy. Participants concerns over the health harms from on-demand services encompassed three broad themes-the expansion of access to and availability of unhealthy commodities, the inadequacy of existing restrictions and regulations in the digital environment and the expansion of personalized marketing and promotional platforms for unhealthy commodities. Health policy experts' proposals to mitigate harms included: limiting access and availability, updating regulations and boosting enforcement and limiting promotion and marketing. Collectively, these findings and proposals can inform future research and public health policy decisions to address harms posed by on-demand delivery of unhealthy commodities.

Indexed as

Health PolicyPublic PolicyBuilt EnvironmentEthanolFast FoodsHumansNew ZealandEthanolalcoholdigital environmentfoodhealth promoting environmentssmoking

Identifiers

PMID37611159
PMCPMC10446141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.