Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37611036›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Determination of drug-related problems among type 2 diabetes outpatients in a hospital in Vietnam: A cross-sectional study.

Duong Thi Ly Huong, Nguyen Thanh Hang, Nguyen Khanh Ly, Nguyen Hong Nhat, Nguyen Thi Lan Huong, Le Thi Phuong Hue, Dang Thi Lan Anh, Bui Thi Kim Dung, Phung Minh Phuong, Luong Thuy Lan and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Duong Thi Ly HuongFaculty of Pharmacy, PHENIKAA University, Ha Dong, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0009-0006-8894-4437
Nguyen Thanh HangFaculty of Pharmacy, PHENIKAA University, Ha Dong, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Nguyen Khanh LyFaculty of Pharmacy, PHENIKAA University, Ha Dong, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Nguyen Hong NhatFaculty of Pharmacy, PHENIKAA University, Ha Dong, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Nguyen Thi Lan HuongThanh Nhan Hospital, Hai Ba Trung, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Le Thi Phuong HueThanh Nhan Hospital, Hai Ba Trung, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Dang Thi Lan AnhThanh Nhan Hospital, Hai Ba Trung, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Bui Thi Kim DungThanh Nhan Hospital, Hai Ba Trung, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Phung Minh PhuongFaculty of Pharmacy, PHENIKAA University, Ha Dong, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Luong Thuy LanFaculty of Pharmacy, PHENIKAA University, Ha Dong, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Truong Thanh TungFaculty of Pharmacy, PHENIKAA University, Ha Dong, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Nguyen Ngoc HieuFaculty of Pharmacy, PHENIKAA University, Ha Dong, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Ngo Hai LyFaculty of Pharmacy, PHENIKAA University, Ha Dong, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Phenikaa University · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDrug-related problems (DRPs) are common in clinical practice and occur at all stages of the medication process. The major factor contributing to DRPs is prescription, although patients' poor adherence to treatment is also a significant factor. This study evaluated type 2 diabetes outpatients in a hospital in Vietnam for drug-related problems (DRPs) and related variables.

methodsA cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 495 outpatients who met the criteria and 157 people agreed to participate in the interview. Medication order review and medication adherence review were used to identify DRPs. The types of DRP were based on the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) categories version 9.0. The identification and assessment DRPs were carried out by clinical pharmacists and get agreed upon by physicians who had not directly prescribed patients who participated in the study.

resultsA total of 762 DRPs were identified via prescribing review process, the average number of DRP on each prescription was 1.54±1.07, while 412 DRPs were determined through patient interviewing. The most frequent DRPs were "ADR (Adverse Drug Reaction) occurring" (68.8%). The main causes were "patient is unable to understand instructions properly" or "patient is not properly instructed", "patient stores insulin inappropriately", "patient decides to use unnecessary drugs" and "patient intentionally uses/takes less drug than prescribed or does not take the drug at all for whatever reason" which accounted for 65.0%, 41.4%, 38.2%, and 28.7%, respectively. From the prescribing review, the most observed DRPs were "Inappropriate drug according to guidelines/formulary" and "No or incomplete drug treatment in spite of existing indication", accounting for 45.0% and 42.9%, respectively. There was a significant association between age (OR 3.38, 95% CI: 1.01-11.30), duration of diabetes (OR 3.61, 95%CI: 1.11-11.74), presence of comorbidity (OR 5.31, 95%CI: 1.97-14.30), polypharmacy (OR: 2.95, 95%CI: 1.01-8.72) and DRPs. In patients, poor knowledge of antidiabetic agents was the main reason to lack adherence and occurring ADR (OR 2.73, 95%CI: 1.32-5.66, p = 0.007 and OR 2.49, 95%CI: 1.54-4.03, p = 0.001 respectively).

conclusionDRPs occurred in the prescribing stage and relating to patient's behavior of drug administration was high. Clear identification of DRPs and the associated factors are essential for building the intervention process to improve effectiveness and safety in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsCross-Sectional StudiesHospitalsHumansMedication AdherenceOutpatientsVietnam

Identifiers

PMID37611036
PMCPMC10446199
OpenAlexW4386086570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.