Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37610972›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Capturing Emerging Experiential Knowledge for Vaccination Guidelines Through Natural Language Processing: Proof-of-Concept Study.

Lea Lösch, Teun Zuiderent-Jerak, Florian Kunneman, Elena Syurina, Marloes Bongers, Mart L Stein, Michelle Chan, Willemine Willems, Aura Timen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Growing Impact of Natural Language Processing in Healthcare and Public Health.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lea LöschAthena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9272-8706
Teun Zuiderent-JerakAthena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3008-1297
Florian KunnemanDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1932-3200
Elena SyurinaAthena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6482-3909
Marloes BongersCentre for Infectious Disease Control (CIb), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0003-3230-8771
Mart L SteinCentre for Infectious Disease Control (CIb), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0502-7993
Michelle ChanDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6741-3673
Willemine WillemsAthena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5439-1332
Aura TimenAthena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5793-5443
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExperience-based knowledge and value considerations of health professionals, citizens, and patients are essential to formulate public health and clinical guidelines that are relevant and applicable to medical practice. Conventional methods for incorporating such knowledge into guideline development often involve a limited number of representatives and are considered to be time-consuming. Including experiential knowledge can be crucial during rapid guidance production in response to a pandemic but it is difficult to accomplish.

objectiveThis proof-of-concept study explored the potential of artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods to capture experiential knowledge and value considerations from existing data channels to make these insights available for public health guideline development.

methodsWe developed and examined AI-based methods in relation to the COVID-19 vaccination guideline development in the Netherlands. We analyzed Dutch messages shared between December 2020 and June 2021 on social media and on 2 databases from the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), where experiences and questions regarding COVID-19 vaccination are reported. First, natural language processing (NLP) filtering techniques and an initial supervised machine learning model were developed to identify this type of knowledge in a large data set. Subsequently, structural topic modeling was performed to discern thematic patterns related to experiences with COVID-19 vaccination.

resultsNLP methods proved to be able to identify and analyze experience-based knowledge and value considerations in large data sets. They provide insights into a variety of experiential knowledge that is difficult to obtain otherwise for rapid guideline development. Some topics addressed by citizens, patients, and professionals can serve as direct feedback to recommendations in the guideline. For example, a topic pointed out that although travel was not considered as a reason warranting prioritization for vaccination in the national vaccination campaign, there was a considerable need for vaccines for indispensable travel, such as cross-border informal caregiving, work or study, or accessing specialized care abroad. Another example is the ambiguity regarding the definition of medical risk groups prioritized for vaccination, with many citizens not meeting the formal priority criteria while being equally at risk. Such experiential knowledge may help the early identification of problems with the guideline's application and point to frequently occurring exceptions that might initiate a revision of the guideline text.

conclusionsThis proof-of-concept study presents NLP methods as viable tools to access and use experience-based knowledge and value considerations, possibly contributing to robust, equitable, and applicable guidelines. They offer a way for guideline developers to gain insights into health professionals, citizens, and patients' experience-based knowledge, especially when conventional methods are difficult to implement. AI-based methods can thus broaden the evidence and knowledge base available for rapid guideline development and may therefore be considered as an important addition to the toolbox of pandemic preparedness.

Indexed as

COVID-19Natural Language ProcessingArtificial IntelligenceCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinescoronavirusCOVID-19guidelines as topichealth policynatural language processingNLPpublic healthSARS-CoV-2social mediastakeholder engagementvaccinationvaccine

Identifiers

PMID37610972
PMCPMC10503655
OpenAlexW4386088440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.