Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37610802›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Mobile Health Hearing Aid Acclimatization and Support Program in Low-Income Communities: Feasibility Study.

Caitlin Frisby, Robert H Eikelboom, Faheema Mahomed-Asmail, Hannah Kuper, David R Moore, Tersia de Kock, Vinaya Manchaiah, De Wet Swanepoel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07690670 (A WhatsApp-Delivered AI-Enabled Support Programme Versus Paper-Based Support for First-Time Hearing Aid Users in Low-Resource Communities), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07690670 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A WhatsApp-Delivered AI-Enabled Support Programme Versus Paper-Based Support for First-Time Hearing Aid Users in Low-Resource Communities: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PretoriaRan2026 to 2026Enrolled66ConditionsHearing LossArmsGo Ultra Hearing Aids, WhatsApp-delivered AI-enabled support, Paper-Based Support Programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Caitlin FrisbyDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9922-2927
Robert H EikelboomDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2911-5381
Faheema Mahomed-AsmailDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3666-8331
Hannah KuperInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8952-0023
David R MooreCommunication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1567-1945
Tersia de KockhearX Foundation, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2850-1598
Vinaya ManchaiahDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1254-8407
De Wet SwanepoelDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8313-1636
University of Pretoria · ZACincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USEar Science Institute Australia · AULondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBSouth African Veterinary Foundation · ZAThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of Colorado Hospital · US

Funding

Mobile technologies for delivering hearing care through community health workersR33DC019598 · NIDCD · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI Naveen K Nagaraj, DeWet Swanepoel · 2024 to 2026
$704k
Mobile technologies for delivering hearing care through community health workersR21DC019598 · NIDCD · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI MOORE, DAVID, SWANEPOEL, DEWET · 2022 to 2023
$361k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC019598NIDCD NIH HHS R33 DC019598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe most common management option for hearing loss is hearing aids. In addition to devices, patients require information and support, including maintenance and troubleshooting. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies can support hearing aid management, acclimatization, and use. This study developed an mHealth acclimatization and support program for first-time hearing aid users and subsequently implemented and pilot-tested the feasibility of the program. The program was facilitated by community health workers (CHWs) in low-income communities in South Africa.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of an mHealth acclimatization and support program supported by CHWs in low-income communities.

methodsAn application-based acclimatization and support was adapted and translated for use in low- and middle-income countries. This program was delivered in the form of 20 different voice notes accompanied by graphical illustrations via WhatsApp or 20 different SMS text messages. The program was provided to first-time hearing aid users immediately after a community-based hearing aid fitting in March 2021 in 2 low-income communities in the Western Cape, South Africa. The 20 messages were sent over a period of 45 days. Participants were contacted telephonically on days 8, 20, and 43 of the program and via open-ended paper-based questionnaires translated to isiXhosa 45 days and 6 months after the program started to obtain information on their experiences, perceptions, and accessibility of the program. Their responses were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

resultsA total of 19 participants fitted with hearing aids received the mHealth acclimatization and support program. Most participants (15/19, 79%) received the program via WhatsApp, with 21% (4/19) of them receiving it via SMS text message. Participants described the program as helpful, supportive, informative, sufficient, and clear at both follow-ups. A total of 14 participants reported that they were still using their hearing aids at the 6-month follow-up. Three participants indicated that not all their questions about hearing aids were answered, and 5 others had minor hearing aid issues. This included feedback (n=1), battery performance (n=1), physical fit (n=2), and issues with hearing aid accessories (n=1). However, CHWs successfully addressed all these issues. There were no notable differences in responses between the participants who received the program via WhatsApp compared with those who received it through SMS text message. Most participants receiving WhatsApp messages reported that the voice notes were easier to understand, but the graphical illustrations supplemented the voice notes well.

conclusionsAn mHealth acclimatization and support program is feasible and potentially assists hearing aid acclimatization and use for first-time users in low-income communities. Scalable mHealth support options can facilitate increased access and improve outcomes of hearing care.

Indexed as

acclimatizationaudiologycommunity-based rehabilitationcommunity health care workerdeveloping countryhealth care workershearinghearing aidhearing aid acclimatizationhearing lossLMIClow- and middle-income countrieslow incomelow resourcemessagingmHealthmobile healthmotivationalremindertechnology usetext messageusability

Identifiers

PMID37610802
PMCPMC10483300
OpenAlexW4386084799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.