Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37610800›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Effects of Increased Standing and Light-Intensity Physical Activity to Improve Postprandial Glucose in Sedentary Office Workers: Protocol for a Randomized Crossover Trial.

Shannon L Wilson, Rachel Crosley-Lyons, Jordan Junk, Kristina Hasanaj, Miranda L Larouche, Kevin Hollingshead, Haiwei Gu, Corrie Whisner, Dorothy D Sears, Matthew P Buman

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04269070 (WorkWell), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04269070 nacompletednot on this map

WorkWell: A Pre-clinical Pilot Study of Increased Standing and Light-intensity Physical Activity in Prediabetic Sedentary Office Workers

TypeinterventionalSponsorArizona State UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled15ConditionsPreDiabetes, ObesityArmsStanding condition, Light physical activity (LPA) condition, Usual behavior condition
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shannon L Wilson *College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4645-3622
Rachel Crosley-Lyons *Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3227-1481
Jordan JunkCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3619-601X
Kristina HasanajCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3954-9848
Miranda L LaroucheCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7961-0041
Kevin HollingsheadCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9136-5459
Haiwei GuCenter for Translational Science, Florida International University, Port St. Lucie, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7598-5022
Corrie WhisnerCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3888-6348
Dorothy D SearsCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9260-3540
Matthew P BumanCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5130-3162

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProlonged bouts of sedentary time, independent from the time spent in engaging in physical activity, significantly increases cardiometabolic risk. Nonetheless, the modern workforce spends large, uninterrupted portions of the day seated at a desk. Previous research suggests-via improved cardiometabolic biomarkers-that this risk might be attenuated by simply disrupting sedentary time with brief breaks of standing or moving. However, this evidence is derived from acute, highly controlled laboratory experiments and thus has low external validity.

objectiveThis study aims to investigate if similar or prolonged cardiometabolic changes are observed after a prolonged (2-week) practice of increased brief standing and moving behaviors in real-world office settings.

methodsThis randomized crossover trial, called the WorkWell Study, will compare the efficacy of two 2-week pilot intervention conditions designed to interrupt sitting time in sedentary office workers (N=15) to a control condition. The intervention conditions use a novel smartphone app to deliver real-time prompts to increase standing (STAND) or moving (MOVE) by an additional 6 minutes each hour during work. Our primary aim is to assess intervention-associated improvements to daily postprandial glucose using continuous glucose monitors. Our secondary aim is to determine whether the interventions successfully evoke substantive positional changes and light-intensity physical activity (LPA). Other outcomes include the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention conditions, fasting blood glucose concentration, femoral artery flow-mediated dilation (f-FMD), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

resultsThe trial is ongoing at the time of submission.

conclusionsThis study is a novel, randomized crossover trial designed to extend a laboratory-based controlled study design into the free-living environment. By using digital health technologies to monitor and prompt participants in real time, we will be able to rigorously test the effects of breaking up sedentary behavior over a longer period of time than is seen in traditional laboratory-based studies. Our innovative approach will leverage the strengths of highly controlled laboratory and free-living experiments to achieve maximal internal and external validity. The research team's multidisciplinary expertise allows for a broad range of biological measures to be sampled, providing robust results that will extend knowledge of both the acute and chronic real-life effects of increased standing and LPA in sedentary office workers. The WorkWell Study uses a rigorous transdisciplinary protocol that will contribute to a more comprehensive picture of the beneficial effects of breaking up sitting behavior.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04269070; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04269070. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/45133.

Indexed as

blood pressuredigital health interventionendothelial functionglycemic controlinsulinmHealthsitting boutssleepstanding desk

Identifiers

PMID37610800
PMCPMC10483290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.