ArticleJAMA dermatology2023
Overall Survival After Mohs Surgery for Early-Stage Merkel Cell Carcinoma.
Article in JAMA dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness and Safety of Treatments for Early-Stage Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Non-Randomized Studies.Cancer medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Treatment profile and prognostic modeling in early-stage Merkel cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- [Merkel cell carcinoma: current surgical approaches and multidisciplinary treatment].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026Review
- Mohs Surgery vs. Wide Local Excision for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Comparing Recurrence Rates, Economic Value, and Aesthetic Outcomes.Journal of cancer science and clinical therapeutics · 2026Article
- Case Report: The role of nodal staging in periocular merkel cell carcinoma - lessons from three cases.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Mohs versus wide local excision: Highlighting the need to define optimal surgical strategies for hidradenocarcinoma.JAAD case reports · 2025Article
- Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Current Treatment Landscape and Emerging Therapeutic Targets.Current oncology reports · 2025Review
- Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Improved Survival in Skin Cancer: A Narrative Review.Dermatology and therapy · 2025Review
- Importance of Surgical Margins in Patients with Early-Stage Merkel Cell Carcinoma.Dermatology and therapy · 2025Article
- Merkel cell carcinoma with concurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the lower lip treated with Mohs micrographic surgery: A case report.JAAD case reports · 2024Article
- No difference in overall survival for primary cutaneous Merkel cell carcinoma after Mohs micrographic surgery and wide local excision: A multicenter cohort analysis.JAAD international · 2024Article
- Considerations Regarding Mohs Surgery for Early-Stage Merkel Cell Carcinoma.JAMA dermatology · 2024Article
- High-volume facilities are significantly more likely to use guideline-adherent systemic immunotherapy for metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: implications for cancer care regionalization.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cutaneous malignant neoplasm with increasing incidence and high mortality. Although it is accepted that the optimal treatment for localized tumors is surgical, the data surrounding the optimal surgical approach are mixed, and current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines state that Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) and wide local excision (WLE) can both be used. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines do not advocate a preference for MMS or WLE and suggest that they can be used interchangeably. Objective: To evaluate the association of surgical approach with overall survival after excision of localized T1/T2 MCC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used the National Cancer Database to assess adults with T1/T2 MCC who were diagnosed between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2018, with pathologically confirmed, negative regional lymph nodes and treated with surgery. The National Cancer Database includes all reportable cases from Commission on Cancer-accredited facilities. Data analysis was performed from October 2022 to May 2023. Exposure: Surgical approach. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival. Results: A total of 2313 patients (mean [SD] age, 71 [10.6] years; 1340 [57.9%] male) were included in the study. Excision with MMS had the best unadjusted survival, with mean (SE) survival rates of 87.4% (3.4%) at 3 years, 84.5% (3.9%) at 5 years, and 81.8% (4.6%) at 10 years vs 86.1% (0.9%) at 3 years, 76.9% (1.2%) at 5 years, and 60.9% (2.0%) at 10 years for patients treated with WLE. Patients treated with narrow-margin excision had similar survival as those treated with WLE, with mean (SE) survival rates of 84.8% (1.4%) at 3 years, 78.3% (1.7%) at 5 years, and 60.8% (3.6%) at 10 years. On multivariable survival analysis, excision with MMS was associated with significantly improved survival compared with WLE (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.97; P = .04). High-volume MCC centers were significantly more likely to use MMS over WLE compared with other centers (odds ratio, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.63-2.44; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the use of MMS (compared with WLE) was associated with significantly improved survival for patients with localized MCC with pathologically confirmed negative lymph nodes treated with surgery. These data suggest that Mohs surgery may provide a more effective treatment for MCC primary tumors than conventional WLE, although the lack of randomization and potential for selection bias in this study highlight the need for future prospective work evaluating this issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.