Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37610751›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Engaging Adolescents in Using Online Patient Portals.

Bryan A Sisk, Alison L Antes, Christine Bereitschaft, Madi Enloe, Sunny Lin, Meghana Srinivas, Fabienne Bourgeois, James M DuBois

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Teen Secure Messaging is Associated With Use of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in One Health System.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bryan A SiskDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Alison L AntesBioethics Research Center, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Christine BereitschaftDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Madi EnloeDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Sunny LinGeneral Medical Sciences, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Meghana SrinivasDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Fabienne BourgeoisDivision of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
James M DuBoisBioethics Research Center, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Many health care systems offer adolescents access to health information through online patient portals, but few studies have explored how to engage adolescents in using and benefiting from online portals. Objective: To determine how US children's hospitals have attempted to encourage adolescent portal use, barriers to engaging adolescents, and ideal future goals for engagement. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study performed structured qualitative interviews with informatics administrators from children's hospitals across the US between February and July 2022. Informatics administrators were employed by US health care systems that managed a children's hospital with at least 50 dedicated pediatrics beds. Data analysis was performed from November 2022 to January 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: This study used thematic analysis of (1) current steps that health care systems had taken to engage adolescents in using their online patient portals and (2) barriers to engaging adolescents and ideal future goals and outcomes of engagement. Results: Among 58 total interviews with 65 informatics administrators who represented 63 hospitals across 58 health care systems, 6 themes of approaches to engaging adolescents in portal use were identified: (1) promoting and educating adolescents about portal enrollment, (2) establishing workflows to support enrollment, (3) seeking and incorporating feedback, (4) creating a culture or environment supporting engagement, (5) increasing portal utility, and (6) limited efforts. Barriers to engaging adolescents in portal use related to either (1) stakeholder investment, interest, and capabilities or (2) intersecting technical, ethical, and legal factors. Participants identified 4 ideal future efforts to engage adolescents: (1) develop adaptable private means of communication with adolescents, (2) use adolescent-centric user design, (3) enhance promotion and education about portal use, and (4) simplify and adapt workflows to encourage enrollment. Participants described 3 ideal outcomes of this future engagement: (1) provide education about current health, (2) prepare for transition to adulthood, and (3) improve digital health education of adolescents. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study of informatics administrators, children's hospitals across the US were found to have varying degrees of efforts to engage adolescents in using their portals. Most of these efforts focused on supporting adolescent enrollment, but fewer efforts focused on making the portal useful and interesting to adolescents.

Indexed as

Access to InformationPatient PortalsAdolescentHumansSelf-ManagementTransition to Adult Care

Identifiers

PMID37610751
PMCPMC10448298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.