ArticlePediatric cardiology2023
Characterizing the Use of Exercise Testing in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot Patients: A Multi-Institutional Survey.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exercise Testing and Counseling in Patients with Tetralogy of Fallot: A Guide for the Pediatric and Congenital Cardiologist.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Review
- Serial Exercise Testing in Children With Known or Suspected Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease: A Narrative Review and Survey of Current Practice.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is an important tool used in the management of patients with congenital heart disease. However, there are no clear guidelines for its use in specific populations, such as repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF). We sought to characterize current practice patterns and attitudes regarding exercise testing in the rTOF population using an online survey distributed to pediatric cardiologists. Analyses were performed using qualitative statistics, Wilcoxon rank-sum, Kruskal-Wallis test, and chi-squared analysis. 103 clinicians completed the survey with 83% routinely sending symptomatic rTOF patients for exercise testing and 59% for asymptomatic patients. Respondents who routinely test asymptomatic patients reported higher levels of perceived helpfulness of exercise testing (p < 0.01) and comfort with CPET interpretation (p < 0.01). Although a large majority of respondents found exercise testing to be helpful (81% either "somewhat" or "very" helpful"), a considerably smaller portion indicated comfort with CPET interpretation (49% either "comfortable" or "very comfortable"). Nearly all respondents (92%) reported changing management primarily based on exercise testing results. However, the frequency of changes varied, with 10% "frequently", 62% "occasionally", 19% "rarely" changing management. There was a statistically significant relationship between the perceived helpfulness of exercise testing and the likelihood of management changes (p < 0.01). While exercise testing is used to make clinical decisions, our findings suggest that in some cases, management changes may be made without a similar degree of confidence in interpreting CPET findings. The variability in attitudes and practices highlights the need for evidence-based guidelines addressing exercise testing in rTOF, particularly for asymptomatic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.