Modified alveolar ridge preservation to promote the osteogenesis of the distal surface of second molar after mandibular impacted third molar extraction: a preliminary study.

Yeping Lu, Yiwen Wang, Ying Chai, Minjie Chen

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yeping LuDepartment of Oral Surgery, Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology and Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.

Yiwen WangDepartment of Oral Surgery, Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology and Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.

Ying ChaiDepartment of Oral Surgery, Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology and Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.

Minjie ChenDepartment of Oral Surgery, Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology and Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China. chenmj_sub@163.com.

Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

Special Research on Medical Innovation of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Science and Technology 21Y11903500

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of the retrospective study was to explore whether the use of a modified alveolar ridge preservation technique impacts osteogenesis on the distal surface of the second molar after mandibular third molar (M3) extraction. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 54 patients were enrolled in this study and divided into three different groups, including modified alveolar ridge preservation (MARP) group, traditional tooth extraction (TRA) group, and classical guided bone regeneration (GBR) group. In this study, MARP was designed with the highlights of the preservation of the alveolar bone superior and lingual to M3. These patients chose different surgical methods according to their own wishes for past infection or in order to prevent pericoronitis, and the operation time and surgical cost of each group were recorded. The periodontal conditions of the ipsilateral mandibular second molar (M2) and the height of its distal alveolar bone were measured during the postoperative follow-up.

resultsThe probing depth, clinical attachment level, and osseous defect depth on the distal surface of the ipsilateral M2 in the MARP group were better than those of the TRA group at any time of the follow-up (P < 0.05 for all), but there was no statistical difference in the measurements when compared to the GBR group at 6 months after operation (P > 0.05 for all).

conclusionsThus, MARP therapy not only improves the regeneration of periodontal osseous defects distal to the M2 after M3 extraction but also reduces the operation time and surgical cost. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This paper introduces a modified surgical method that can not only economically and effectively remove the impacted mandibular third molar but also obtain stable osteogenesis.

Indexed as

Molar, ThirdTooth, ImpactedAlveolar ProcessHumansMandibleMolarOsteogenesisRetrospective StudiesTooth ExtractionAlveolar ridge preservationMandibular impacted third molarOperation time and surgical costOsseous defect depthOsteogenesis

Identifiers

PMID37610460

DOI10.1007/s00784-023-05224-7

OpenAlexW4386083645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.