Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37610284›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2023

Energetic and informational masking place dissociable demands on listening effort: Evidence from simultaneous electroencephalography and pupillometrya).

Sarah Villard, Tyler K Perrachione, Sung-Joo Lim, Ayesha Alam, Gerald Kidd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah VillardDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Tyler K PerrachioneDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Sung-Joo LimDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Ayesha AlamDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Gerald KiddDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.

Funding

CENTRAL FACTORS IN AUDITORY MASKINGR01DC004545 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI KIDD, GERALD, JR · 2000 to 2021
$9.0M
Top-Down Control of Selective AmplificationR01DC013286 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI BEST, VIRGINIA ANN, KIDD, GERALD, JR · 2014 to 2023
$6.0M
Listening effort under auditory masking conditions in persons with acquired aphasiaK99DC018829 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI VILLARD, SARAH NOELLE · 2020 to 2021
$179k
NIDCD NIH HHS K99 DC018829NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004545NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The task of processing speech masked by concurrent speech/noise can pose a substantial challenge to listeners. However, performance on such tasks may not directly reflect the amount of listening effort they elicit. Changes in pupil size and neural oscillatory power in the alpha range (8-12 Hz) are prominent neurophysiological signals known to reflect listening effort; however, measurements obtained through these two approaches are rarely correlated, suggesting that they may respond differently depending on the specific cognitive demands (and, by extension, the specific type of effort) elicited by specific tasks. This study aimed to compare changes in pupil size and alpha power elicited by different types of auditory maskers (highly confusable intelligible speech maskers, speech-envelope-modulated speech-shaped noise, and unmodulated speech-shaped noise maskers) in young, normal-hearing listeners. Within each condition, the target-to-masker ratio was set at the participant's individually estimated 75% correct point on the psychometric function. The speech masking condition elicited a significantly greater increase in pupil size than either of the noise masking conditions, whereas the unmodulated noise masking condition elicited a significantly greater increase in alpha oscillatory power than the speech masking condition, suggesting that the effort needed to solve these respective tasks may have different neural origins.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyListening EffortHumansNeurophysiologyPsychometricsSpeechSpeech Disorders

Identifiers

PMID37610284
PMCPMC10449482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.