Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37610117›Full record

ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2023

Validation of Claims-Based Algorithm for Lyme Disease, Massachusetts, USA.

Noelle M Cocoros, Sheryl A Kluberg, Sarah J Willis, Susan Forrow, Bradford D Gessner, Cameron T Nutt, Alejandro Cane, Nathan Petrou, Meera Sury, Chanu Rhee and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Lyme Disease and Health Care Costs.JAMA network open · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Noelle M Cocoros
Sheryl A Kluberg
Sarah J Willis
Susan Forrow
Bradford D Gessner
Cameron T Nutt
Alejandro Cane
Nathan Petrou
Meera Sury
Chanu Rhee
Luis Jodar
Aaron Mendelsohn
Emma R Hoffman
Robert Jin
John Aucott
Sarah J Pugh
James H Stark
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USHarvard Pilgrim Health Care · USHarvard University · USPfizer (United States) · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared with notifiable disease surveillance, claims-based algorithms estimate higher Lyme disease incidence, but their accuracy is unknown. We applied a previously developed Lyme disease algorithm (diagnosis code plus antimicrobial drug prescription dispensing within 30 days) to an administrative claims database in Massachusetts, USA, to identify a Lyme disease cohort during July 2000-June 2019. Clinicians reviewed and adjudicated medical charts from a cohort subset by using national surveillance case definitions. We calculated positive predictive values (PPVs). We identified 12,229 Lyme disease episodes in the claims database and reviewed and adjudicated 128 medical charts. The algorithm's PPV for confirmed, probable, or suspected cases was 93.8% (95% CI 88.1%-97.3%); the PPV was 66.4% (95% CI 57.5%-74.5%) for confirmed and probable cases only. In a high incidence setting, a claims-based algorithm identified cases with a high PPV, suggesting it can be used to assess Lyme disease burden and supplement traditional surveillance data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsLyme DiseaseCost of IllnessDrug PrescriptionsHumansMassachusettsalgorithmbacteriaclaims databasehealthcarehealthcare insuranceLyme diseaseMassachusettsparasitesUnited Statesvector-borne infectionszoonoses

Identifiers

PMID37610117
PMCPMC10461665
OpenAlexW4386084583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.