Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37609711›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2023

Quality of life after wearing multifocal contact lenses for myopia control for 2 weeks in the BLINK Study.

Anita Ticak, Jeffrey J Walline, David A Berntsen, Donald O Mutti, Lisa A Jones-Jordan, Laura Cardenas, Elizabeth Day, Bradley E Dougherty, BLINK Study Group

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anita TicakUniversity of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jeffrey J WallineThe Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9503-6094
David A BerntsenUniversity of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, Texas, USA.
Donald O MuttiThe Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Lisa A Jones-JordanThe Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Laura CardenasUniversity of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, Texas, USA.
Elizabeth DayThe Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Bradley E DoughertyThe Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
BLINK Study Group
The Ohio State University · USUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

The OSU Center for Clinical and Translational Science: Advancing Today's Discoveries to Improve HealthUL1TR002733 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RINGEL, MATTHEW D · 2018 to 2022
$28.9M
Research Programming ModuleP30EY007551 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI LAURA J. FRISHMAN · 1988 to 2026
$16.4M
Soft Bifocal Contact Lens Myopia Control - Clincal CenterU10EY023210 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MUTTI, DONALD O. · 2014 to 2018
$2.9M
Examination of Myopia Progression and Consequences and Mechanism of Soft Multifocal Contact Lens Myopia Control - Clinical CenterUG1EY023204 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI BERNTSEN, DAVID A · 2019 to 2023
$2.7M
Soft Bifocal Contact Lens Myopia ControlU10EY023204 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI BERNTSEN, DAVID A · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
Examination of Myopia Progression and Consequences and Mechanism of Soft Multifocal Contact Lens Myopia Control - Clinical CenterUG1EY023210 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MUTTI, DONALD O. · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
Soft Bifocal Contact Lens Myopia Control - Data Coordinating CenterU10EY023206 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JORDAN, LISA A · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
Examination of Myopia Progression and Consequences and Mechanism of Soft Multifocal Contact Lens Myopia Control - Data Coordinating CenterUG1EY023206 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JORDAN, LISA A · 2019 to 2023
$1.4M
Soft Bifocal Contact Lens Myopia Control - Study ChairU10EY023208 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WALLINE, JEFFREY JAY · 2014 to 2018
$742k
Examination of Myopia Progression and Consequences and Mechanism of Soft Multifocal Contact Lens Myopia ControlUG1EY023208 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WALLINE, JEFFREY JAY · 2019 to 2023
$678k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002733NEI NIH HHS P30 EY007551NEI NIH HHS U10 EY023NEI NIH HHS U10 EY023204NEI NIH HHS U10 EY023206NEI NIH HHS U10EY023206NEI NIH HHS U10 EY023208NEI NIH HHS U10 EY023210NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY023204NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY023206NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY023208NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY023210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo validate Pediatric Refractive Error Profile 2 (PREP2) subscales that can be used to evaluate contact lens wearers and compare vision-specific quality of life measurements between children wearing multifocal and single vision contact lenses for 2 weeks.

methodsTwo hundred and ninety-four myopic children aged 7-11 years (inclusive) were enrolled in the 3-year, double-masked Bifocal Lenses In Nearsighted Kids (BLINK) Study. Participants completed the PREP2 survey after having worn contact lenses for 2 weeks. The Vision, Symptoms, Activities and Overall PREP2 subscales were used to compare participants' subjective assessment while wearing +1.50 or +2.50 D add multifocal or single vision contact lenses. Rasch analysis was used to validate each subscale and to compare participants' subjective assessment of contact lens wear.

resultsItem fit to the Rasch model was good for all scales, with no individual items having infit mean square statistics outside the recommended range (0.7-1.3). Response category function was acceptable for all subscales, with ordered category thresholds. Measurement precision, assessed by the Rasch person reliability statistic, was less than ideal (≥0.8) for three of the subscales, but met the minimum acceptable standard of 0.5. Scores for the Vision subscale differed by treatment assignment (p = 0.03), indicating that participants with the highest add power reported statistically worse quality of vision, although the difference was only 3.9 units on a scale of 1-100. Girls reported fewer symptoms than boys (p = 0.006), but there were no other differences between boys and girls.

conclusionsRasch analysis demonstrates that the PREP2 survey is a valid instrument for assessing refractive error-specific quality of life. These results suggest that vision-related quality of life is not meaningfully affected by 2 weeks of soft multifocal contact lens wear for myopia control.

Indexed as

Contact Lenses, HydrophilicMyopiaRefractive ErrorsChildFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeReproducibility of Resultscontact lensmultifocalmyopiapaediatricquality of life

Identifiers

PMID37609711
PMCPMC10592163
OpenAlexW4386084406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.