Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37609700›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2023

Investigation of the intraoperative cortical responses to spinal motor mapping in a patient with chronic pain.

Deepak Berwal, Ilknur Telkes, Shruti Agarwal, Steven Paniccioli, Kevin McCarthy, Marisa DiMarzio, Bryan McLaughlin, Julie G Pilitsis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Deepak BerwalCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, United States.
Ilknur TelkesCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, United States.
Shruti AgarwalCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9796-7135
Steven PaniccioliNuvasive Clinical Services, San Diego, California, United States.
Kevin McCarthyNuvasive Clinical Services, San Diego, California, United States.
Marisa DiMarzioCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, United States.
Bryan McLaughlinMicro-leads Medical, Somerville, Massachusetts, United States.
Julie G PilitsisCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6488-9692
Florida Atlantic University · USNuVasive (United States) · USMicro-Leads (United States) · US

Funding

High-Resolution, Spinal Cord Stimulation for Non-Opioid Treatment of Neuropathic PainU44NS115111 · NINDS · MICRO-LEADS, INC. · PI MCLAUGHLIN, BRYAN L · 2019 to 2025
$9.8M
NINDS NIH HHS U44 NS115111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) surgery for chronic pain is shown to provide effective guidance during device placement. Electromyography (EMG) is used to determine the laterality of the paddle. In some SCS cases, laterality cannot be obtained via EMG due to patient physiology. Electroencephalography (EEG) is already used in IONM to monitor cortical responses. Here, we show proof-of-concept of assessing the responses of epidurally evoked EMGs simultaneously with EEGs to determine laterality during IONM using a high-resolution (HR) SCS paddle. An 8-column HR-SCS paddle was acutely placed at T9-T10 interspace in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. EMG signals from 18 muscle groups were recorded simultaneously with 60-channel EEG signals at various stimulation amplitudes (0-10 mA). Particular attention was paid to regions associated with pain including the somatosensory cortex (S1), prefrontal cortex (PFC), and motor cortex (M1). When left and right lateral contacts were stimulated at low amplitudes (1-2 mA), significant changes were seen in θ, α, and β powers in the contralateral PFC but not in M1 or S1. There was a significant correlation between M1 and contralateral contacts in α power. At higher currents (7-8 mA), right-sided contacts resulted in α power change. We found significant differences in α, θ, and β powers in PFC for contralateral stimulation of the lateral SCS contacts at low amplitudes and in α power at higher amplitudes. The changes in PFC suggest the potential of EEG for understanding a cortical mechanism of action of SCS and provide insight into the pathophysiology of chronic pain.

Indexed as

Chronic PainGastropodaAnimalsElectroencephalographyElectromyographyFunctional LateralityHumanschronic paincortical lateralizationEEGevoked EMGspinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID37609700
PMCPMC10649839
OpenAlexW4386084182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.