Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37609632›Full record

ArticleiScience2023

Artificial intelligence and machine learning in prehospital emergency care: A scoping review.

Marcel Lucas Chee, Mark Leonard Chee, Haotian Huang, Katelyn Mazzochi, Kieran Taylor, Han Wang, Mengling Feng, Andrew Fu Wah Ho, Fahad Javaid Siddiqui, Marcus Eng Hock Ong and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Use of artificial intelligence to support prehospital traumatic injury care: A scoping review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Article
  17. Pre-Hospital Stroke Care beyond the MSU.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marcel Lucas CheeFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Mark Leonard CheeFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Haotian HuangFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Katelyn MazzochiFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kieran TaylorFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Han WangSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Mengling FengSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Andrew Fu Wah HoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Fahad Javaid SiddiquiPre-Hospital and Emergency Research Centre, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Marcus Eng Hock OngDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Nan LiuPre-Hospital and Emergency Research Centre, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our scoping review provides a comprehensive analysis of the landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in prehospital emergency care (PEC). It contributes to the field by highlighting the most studied AI applications and identifying the most common methodological approaches across 106 included studies. The findings indicate a promising future for AI in PEC, with many unique use cases, such as prognostication, demand prediction, resource optimization, and the Internet of Things continuous monitoring systems. Comparisons with other approaches showed AI outperforming clinicians and non-AI algorithms in most cases. However, most studies were internally validated and retrospective, highlighting the need for rigorous prospective validation of AI applications before implementation in clinical settings. We identified knowledge and methodological gaps using an evidence map, offering a roadmap for future investigators. We also discussed the significance of explainable AI for establishing trust in AI systems among clinicians and facilitating real-world validation of AI models.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence applicationsEmergency medicinePreventive medicine

Identifiers

PMID37609632
PMCPMC10440716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.