Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37609578›Full record

Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2023

Centrifugation-Assisted Three-Dimensional Printing of Devices Embedded with Fully Enclosed Microchannels.

Chia-Heng Chu, Enerelt Burentugs, Dohwan Lee, Jacob M Owens, Ruxiu Liu, Albert B Frazier, A Fatih Sarioglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chia-Heng ChuSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Enerelt BurentugsSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Dohwan LeeSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jacob M OwensWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Ruxiu LiuSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Albert B FrazierSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
A Fatih SariogluSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7191-4342

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The challenges in reliably removing the sacrificial material from fully enclosed microfluidic channels hinder the use of three-dimensional (3D) printing to create microfluidic devices with intricate geometries. With advances in printer resolution, the etching of sacrificial materials from increasingly smaller channels is poised to be a bottleneck using the existing techniques. In this study, we introduce a microfabrication approach that utilizes centrifugation to effortlessly and efficiently remove the sacrificial materials from 3D-printed microfluidic devices with densely packed microfeatures. We characterize the process by measuring the etch rate under different centrifugal forces and developed a theoretical model to estimate process parameters for a given geometry. The effect of the device layout on the centrifugal etching process is also investigated. We demonstrate the applicability of our approach on devices fabricated using inkjet 3D printing and stereolithography. Finally, the advantages of the introduced approach over commonly used injection-based etching of sacrificial material are experimentally demonstrated in direct comparisons. A robust method to postprocess additively manufactured geometries composed of intricate microfluidic channels can help utilize both the large printing volume and high spatial resolution afforded by 3D printing in creating a variety of devices ranging from scaffolds to large-scale microfluidic assays.

Indexed as

3D microfluidics3D printingadditive manufacturingcentrifugationpostprocessingsacrificial material removal

Identifiers

PMID37609578
PMCPMC10440665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.