Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2023
Centrifugation-Assisted Three-Dimensional Printing of Devices Embedded with Fully Enclosed Microchannels.
Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Single-digit-micrometer-resolution continuous liquid interface production.Science advances · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The challenges in reliably removing the sacrificial material from fully enclosed microfluidic channels hinder the use of three-dimensional (3D) printing to create microfluidic devices with intricate geometries. With advances in printer resolution, the etching of sacrificial materials from increasingly smaller channels is poised to be a bottleneck using the existing techniques. In this study, we introduce a microfabrication approach that utilizes centrifugation to effortlessly and efficiently remove the sacrificial materials from 3D-printed microfluidic devices with densely packed microfeatures. We characterize the process by measuring the etch rate under different centrifugal forces and developed a theoretical model to estimate process parameters for a given geometry. The effect of the device layout on the centrifugal etching process is also investigated. We demonstrate the applicability of our approach on devices fabricated using inkjet 3D printing and stereolithography. Finally, the advantages of the introduced approach over commonly used injection-based etching of sacrificial material are experimentally demonstrated in direct comparisons. A robust method to postprocess additively manufactured geometries composed of intricate microfluidic channels can help utilize both the large printing volume and high spatial resolution afforded by 3D printing in creating a variety of devices ranging from scaffolds to large-scale microfluidic assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.