Editorial: Plant probiotics: recent and future prospects.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A Review of the Regulatory Role of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria in Alfalfa Under Stress Conditions.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
   Review
2. The blueberry phyllosphere microbiota: tissue-specific core communities and their stability across cultivars and years.BMC plant biology · 2025
   Article
3. Harnessing beneficial soil bacteria to promote sustainable agriculture and food security: a one health perspective.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
   Review
4. Plant growth-promoting fungi improve tobacco yield and chemical components by reassembling rhizosphere fungal microbiome and recruiting probiotic taxa.Environmental microbiome · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as