Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37609417›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Comparing narcotics detection canine accuracy across breeds.

Brian Lee Rice, Joseph Velasco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian Lee RiceUniversity of Arkansas Fort Smith, USA.
Joseph VelascoSul Ross State University, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigations of detection canine performance across breeds has yielded mixed results, often reporting behavioral differences observed by researchers or reported by handlers through surveys. The present study tested 34 narcotics detection canines; 25 Belgian Malinois and 9 German Shepherds to determine if there were any differences between the breeds in overall rate of detection accuracy and the number of false alerts in searches. As previously determined, results of the present study support the continued use of narcotic detection canines for law enforcement agencies (i.e., positive alert percentage >90%; false alert percentage <10%). The results indicate that Belgian Malinois and German Shepherds are statistically undifferentiated in their overall rate of narcotics detection accuracy [V(34) = 0.048, p = 0.778] and [χ

Indexed as

Canine accuracyDetection canine breedsDetection caninesPolice canines

Identifiers

PMID37609417
PMCPMC10440507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.