ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2023
Labeling male anorectal malformations: objective evaluation of radiologic imaging before surgery.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Prone cross-table lateral x-ray (CTLxR) and colostogram aid surgical planning for anorectal malformations (ARMs) without perineal fistulas. We suggest objective imaging tools to classify ARMs. Methods: Three observers prospectively evaluated CTLxR and colostograms of male ARM patients (2012-2022) without perineal fistulas. The level of the rectal pouch was estimated with pubococcygeal (PC) and ischiatic (I) lines. On CTLxR, we described the "pigeon sign", defined as the rectal pouch ending with a beak-like image, suspicious for a rectourinary fistula. ARM was defined as rectobulbar when the rectal pouch was below the I line, rectoprostatic when between PC and I lines, and rectovesical when above the PC line. Concordance was assessed with Fleiss' kappa. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the "pigeon sign" were calculated. Results: Thirteen patients were included in this study. The interobserver agreement on CTLxR was 69.2% ( Conclusion: PC and I lines and the "pigeon sign" are useful tools in examining CTLxR and colostograms. Adequate CTLxR interpretation may modify surgical strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.