ArticleCureus2023
Improving Orthopedic Documentation Using Post-Operative Note Proformas: A Quality Improvement Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAccurate medical documentation is important in the perioperative period, ensuring the safe transfer of information between teams involved in the surgical patient's care. This has been highlighted by multiple standards of care guidelines within the United Kingdom. The use of standardized pre-templated documents has displayed significant success in minimizing errors during the admission and operative stages. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether a similar proforma for the post-operative stage is successful in orthopedic patients.
methodsA retrospective review of 25 consecutive orthopedic elective patients was conducted during the first cycle. Exclusion criteria included patients who were under 16, day case procedures, and admission due to trauma. The second cycle consisted of a prospective review of 25 patients a month following the implementation of the new proforma. Both cycles were scored against 10 inclusion parameters as outlined by national guidelines.
resultsImplementation of the proforma resulted in a significant improvement in post-operative note compliance. A total of six parameters showed a statistically significant improvement (p<0.05). This included wound assessment (58.3%-100%, p<0.001), post-operative imaging (37.5%-92%, p<0.001), neurovascular assessment (83.3%-100%, p=0.017), National Early Warning Score (25.0%-100%, p<0.001), venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (29.2%-96.0%, p<0.001), and antibiotic administration (4.2%-84.0%, p<0.001).
conclusionsMonitoring of important clinical parameters significantly improved following the implementation of the post-operative proforma. These results will hopefully cause the introduction of other proformas in other surgical specialties and other units.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.