ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023
First molecular detection of
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review on the Occurrence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- A one-health approach to surveillance of tick-borne pathogens across different host groups.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Detection ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Three Cases of Human Babesiosis, Italy, 2017-2020.Emerging infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Assessing zoonotic risk in a fenced natural park in northwestern Italy: integrating camera traps for a vector-host approach to investigate tick-borne pathogens.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Case report: First autochthonousFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Following the increase of wild boar ( Methods: By using a Results: Out of 243 boars, 15 (i.e., 6.2, 95% CI: 3.4-9.9) tested positive to Discussion: Data demonstrate for the first time the occurrence of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.