ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2023
ChatGPT-4: Transforming Medical Education and Addressing Clinical Exposure Challenges in the Post-pandemic Era.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Large Language Models for Chatbot Health Advice Studies: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Examining the Role of Large Language Models in Orthopedics: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in Abdominopelvic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Applications and Impact.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Pooled it
- Introducing Adjunct Medical Products and Artificial Intelligence Governance Gaps.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Review
- Review
- A systematic review of the limitations of large language models in generating healthcare content.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Virtual case reasoning and AI-assisted diagnostic instruction: an empirical study based on body interact and large language models.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Mapping the use of artificial intelligence in medical education: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- ChatGPT and Other Large Language Models in Medical Education - Scoping Literature Review.Medical science educator · 2025Review
- Exploring the use of ChatGPT-4o in enhancing career development counseling for medical students: a study protocol.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Qualitative metrics from the biomedical literature for evaluating large language models in clinical decision-making: a narrative review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Review
- Responsible Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Research and Writing: Summarizing ICMJE Guideline.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Enhancing patient information texts in orthopaedics: How OpenAI's 'ChatGPT' can help.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Article
- AI and Ethics: A Systematic Review of the Ethical Considerations of Large Language Model Use in Surgery Research.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Potential of ChatGPT for High-Quality Information in Patient Education for Sports Surgery.Cureus · 2024Article
- Letter to the editor 'Evaluating ChatGPT responses in the context of a 53-year-old male with a femoral neck fracture: a qualitative analysis'.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- ChatGPT-4, Medical Education, and Clinical Exposure Challenges.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected medical education, constraining clinical exposure and posing unprecedented challenges for students and junior doctors. This research explores the potential of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically the ChatGPT-4 language model, to transform medical education and address the deficiencies in clinical exposure during the post-pandemic era. Research Questions/Purpose: What is the potential of AI large language models in delivering safe and coherent medical advice to junior doctors for clinical orthopaedic scenarios? Patients and Methods: A series of diverse orthopaedic questions was presented to ChatGPT-4, from general medicine to highly specialised fields. The questions were based on a variety of common orthopaedic presentations including neck of femur fracture, compartment syndrome, pulmonary embolism, and a motor vehicle accident. A validated questionnaire (Likert Scale) was implemented to evaluate the answers produced by ChatGPT-4. Results: Our results indicate that ChatGPT-4 exhibits exceptional proficiency in delivering accurate and coherent medical advice. Its intuitive interface, accessibility, and sophisticated algorithm render it an ideal supplementary tool for medical students and junior doctors. Despite certain limitations, such as its inability to fully address highly specialised areas, this study highlights the potential of AI and ChatGPT-4 to revolutionise medical education and fill the clinical exposure void generated by the pandemic. Future research should concentrate on the practical application of ChatGPT-4 in real-world medical environments and its integration with other emerging technologies to optimise its influence on the education and training of healthcare professionals. Conclusions: ChatGPT-4's integration into orthopaedic education and practice can mitigate pandemic-related experience gaps, promoting self-directed, personalised learning and decision-making support for interns and residents. Future advancements may address limitations to enhance healthcare professionals' learning and expertise. Level of Evidence: Level III evidence-observational study.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.